Judicial Review on the Decisions of the Specific Authorities of the Administrative Hearing in Iran and Lebanon

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FALLAH ZADEH ALI MOHAMMAD; Alidadzadeh Roholla

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW Year:2020 | Volume:10 | Issue:2 Page(s): 639-664

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,162

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Judicial Review on the Decisions of the Specific Authorities of the Administrative Hearing in Iran and Lebanon

Author(s)

FALLAH ZADEH ALI MOHAMMAD | Alidadzadeh Roholla | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Judicial reviewQ1

Specific authorities of the administrative hearingQ1

The Administrative Justice courtQ1

The Council of the stateQ1

Abstract

Administrative judgment is functionally very similar in Iran and Lebanon. In the highest level of administrative judgment in these two countries, there are two authorities of “ Administrative Justice Court” and “ The Council of the state” . In both countries, in lower levels of administrative hearing, the specific authorities have special positions and do the dispute resolution and decision-making in various subjects of administrative affairs. These authorities have plenty of types and they do not follow a single judicial law order. The legal system of Iran encounters a chaos in the field of Judicial review of “ Administrative Justice Court” in the way that sometimes the general courts are the ultimate authority to hear the contest of awards and sometime the “ Administrative Justice Court” does so. The AJC does not take a unique judicial procedure in processing the verdicts of these authorities and a divergence of decisions is observed in this regard. The main purpose of this research is to compare the Judicial review on the decisions of the specific authorities of administrative hearing in these two legal systems. The methodology of the research is comparative and descriptive-analytical. The most important finding of this study shows that the “ Administrative Justice Court” of Iran unlike the “ Council of the State” of Lebanon, has not accepted its competency about all the specific authorities of administrative hearings.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FALLAH ZADEH, ALI MOHAMMAD, & Alidadzadeh, Roholla. (2020). Judicial Review on the Decisions of the Specific Authorities of the Administrative Hearing in Iran and Lebanon. COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW, 10(2 ), 639-664. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/246422/en

Vancouver: Copy

FALLAH ZADEH ALI MOHAMMAD, Alidadzadeh Roholla. Judicial Review on the Decisions of the Specific Authorities of the Administrative Hearing in Iran and Lebanon. COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW[Internet]. 2020;10(2 ):639-664. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/246422/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI MOHAMMAD FALLAH ZADEH, and Roholla Alidadzadeh, “Judicial Review on the Decisions of the Specific Authorities of the Administrative Hearing in Iran and Lebanon,” COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW, vol. 10, no. 2 , pp. 639–664, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/246422/en

Related Journal Papers