COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF WITTGENSTEIN AND GADAMER’S NARRATION OF HISTORICITY OF UNDERSTANDING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAAYAT JAHROMI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES) Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:65/1 Page(s): 41-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

638

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF WITTGENSTEIN AND GADAMER’S NARRATION OF HISTORICITY OF UNDERSTANDING

Author(s)

RAAYAT JAHROMI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HISTORYQ2

LANGUAGEQ2

CUSTOMQ3

TRADITIONQ2

CONTEXTUALISMQ2

Abstract

The domination of propositional logic in Wittgenstein’s philosophical manner in Tractatus which is revealed in the conceptions of picture, representation and correspondence on one hand, and analytical philosophy and its scientific, anti-metaphysics and logic-oriented content on the other hand, challenges Wittgenstein’s historic approach and his attention towards common hermeneutical concepts, whereas historical indications in the later Wittgenstein’s contextualistic manner namely CUSTOM, game and rule, culture and common LANGUAGE legitimize his slight historicism. On the contrary, HISTORY is one of the pillars in Gadamer’s hermeneutical system in which the relation with temporality and TRADITION is obvious. Finally, regardless of irrefutable conceptual diversion, the emphasis on the dimensions of the above mentioned of CONTEXTUALISM resulted in relative convergence between later Wittgenstein and Gadamer’s thought in this domain.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAAYAT JAHROMI, MOHAMMAD. (2012). COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF WITTGENSTEIN AND GADAMER’S NARRATION OF HISTORICITY OF UNDERSTANDING. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), -(65/1), 41-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/248298/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAAYAT JAHROMI MOHAMMAD. COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF WITTGENSTEIN AND GADAMER’S NARRATION OF HISTORICITY OF UNDERSTANDING. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2012;-(65/1):41-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/248298/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD RAAYAT JAHROMI, “COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF WITTGENSTEIN AND GADAMER’S NARRATION OF HISTORICITY OF UNDERSTANDING,” KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), vol. -, no. 65/1, pp. 41–56, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/248298/en

Related Journal Papers