LEGAL DISPUTE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND URUGUAY (2010); CLARIFYING SOME ASPECTS AND MATTERS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOUSAVI SEYYED FAZLLOLAH; MOUSAVIFAR SEYYED HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY Year:2016 | Volume:45 | Issue:4 Page(s): 589-608

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,468

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LEGAL DISPUTE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND URUGUAY (2010); CLARIFYING SOME ASPECTS AND MATTERS

Author(s)

MOUSAVI SEYYED FAZLLOLAH | MOUSAVIFAR SEYYED HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BURDEN OF PROOFQ2

JURISDICTION OF ICJQ2

PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAWQ1

PROCEDURAL OBLIGATIONSQ2

SUBSTANTIAL OBLIGATIONSQ2

Abstract

After trying some legal and political choices in order to settle the disputes with Uruguay about the treaty of 1975 Uruguay River statute, Argentina proceed against Uruguay before the ICJ. The allegations based on the procedural and substantial matters violations, set forth in the statute, and violation against some international environmental law principals which all of them related to potential risks arising from launching two paper mill located near the border river. After the time that the ICJ recognized its jurisdiction and initiating the trial and considering the petition, defenses and the evidences, finally, on 20th of March 2010, issued its second environmental judgment after the case of 1977, the dispute between Hungary and Slovakia. The court has mentioned many important matters of customary rules of international environmental law and some of its subjects such as prevention principals, environmental assessment and prevention of harmful activities. In this judgment, the court did not properly adjudge Uruguay’s violations of substantive obligation and adjudge Uruguay just for violations of procedural rules.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MOUSAVI, SEYYED FAZLLOLAH, & MOUSAVIFAR, SEYYED HOSSEIN. (2016). LEGAL DISPUTE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND URUGUAY (2010); CLARIFYING SOME ASPECTS AND MATTERS. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, 45(4), 589-608. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/251234/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOUSAVI SEYYED FAZLLOLAH, MOUSAVIFAR SEYYED HOSSEIN. LEGAL DISPUTE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND URUGUAY (2010); CLARIFYING SOME ASPECTS AND MATTERS. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2016;45(4):589-608. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/251234/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED FAZLLOLAH MOUSAVI, and SEYYED HOSSEIN MOUSAVIFAR, “LEGAL DISPUTE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND URUGUAY (2010); CLARIFYING SOME ASPECTS AND MATTERS,” PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 589–608, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/251234/en

Related Journal Papers