REFLECTIONS ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF DRONE STRIKES AGAINST TERRORISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD; MOHAMMADI MEHRDAD; MOKARRAMI YASER

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY Year:2019 | Volume:49 | Issue:1 Page(s): 291-311

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

796

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REFLECTIONS ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF DRONE STRIKES AGAINST TERRORISM

Author(s)

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD | MOHAMMADI MEHRDAD | MOKARRAMI YASER | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DRONESQ1

INTERNATIONAL LAWQ1

THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICTSQ1

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWQ1

HUMAN RIGHTS LAWQ2

Abstract

In recent decades, the Middle East has been the scene of armed conflicts between ultra-regional powers and some regional states and non-state actors, such as terrorist groups. During the past decade the use of DRONES for bombing, assassination, detection and espionage by ultra-regional states has been prevalent under various pretexts in the Middle East region, which has mostly led to the violation of state sovereignty of regional states. This violation of sovereignty has always been legally justified by the ultra-regional governments. The major part of such justifications has been based upon the legal challenges on the rules governing the use of DRONES. They are, in fact, considered as coverage for illegal activities of these states. These challenges have largely been in line with the interpretation of the provisions against the use of force and self-defense, the rules governing the conflicts and the rules of humanitarian law and fight against terrorism. Therefore, a clear understanding and interpretation of these challenges and resolving them according to international legal rules can provide a realistic picture of the status quo and leads to a more accurate understanding of the INTERNATIONAL LAW in this field.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, SEYED MOHAMMAD, MOHAMMADI, MEHRDAD, & MOKARRAMI, YASER. (2019). REFLECTIONS ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF DRONE STRIKES AGAINST TERRORISM. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, 49(1 ), 291-311. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/251275/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD, MOHAMMADI MEHRDAD, MOKARRAMI YASER. REFLECTIONS ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF DRONE STRIKES AGAINST TERRORISM. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2019;49(1 ):291-311. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/251275/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MOHAMMAD HOSSEINI, MEHRDAD MOHAMMADI, and YASER MOKARRAMI, “REFLECTIONS ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF DRONE STRIKES AGAINST TERRORISM,” PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, vol. 49, no. 1 , pp. 291–311, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/251275/en

Related Journal Papers