HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE QUIDDITY OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS AMONG MUSLIM LOGICIANS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMIRKHANI MAHNAZ; BARKHORDARI ZEINAB; POURSALEH AMIRI MALIHEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES Year:2017 | Volume:- | Issue:19 Page(s): 65-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

886

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE QUIDDITY OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS AMONG MUSLIM LOGICIANS

Author(s)

AMIRKHANI MAHNAZ | BARKHORDARI ZEINAB | POURSALEH AMIRI MALIHEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WHAT NESS OF CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONSQ1

CONCEPT OF “GENUS” OF CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONSQ1

IDEAQ2

PUBLIC CONFESSIONQ1

Abstract

This study aims to examine the historical development of conventional propositions among Muslim logicians. The findings shows that Farabi and Ibn Sina believe that the CONCEPT OF “GENUS” OF CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS has the IDEA of surmise and they refer to the ultimate function of conventional propositions in practical field. The next logicians have chosen the proposition as the concept of genus of conventional propositions that may show the change of their position about the concept of proposition and its scope. Logicians before the seventh century have proposed definitions similar to the definition of “Nejat” and “Esharat” of Ibn Sina. Logicians of the seventh century have used from the word of “yahkom” that such an approach is the result of the issues of necessity of judgment, criteria and factors of conventional propositions in the scope of innateness. In the meantime, the views of Tusi and Hilli due to the new situation in the types of conventional propositions and understand its heteronym have a unique feature. The most important approaches can be seen in the definitions of the commentators of “Shamsiyya”. They have used the most important issues in the definition of conventional propositions from their perspective. Qutb Razi refers to the first reaction of people to these views. Taftazani pay attentions to the the different value of certainties and conventional propositions and Sialkoti expresses his IDEA in a new style by studying the commentators of “Shamsiyya”.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMIRKHANI, MAHNAZ, BARKHORDARI, ZEINAB, & POURSALEH AMIRI, MALIHEH. (2017). HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE QUIDDITY OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS AMONG MUSLIM LOGICIANS. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, -(19), 65-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/251829/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMIRKHANI MAHNAZ, BARKHORDARI ZEINAB, POURSALEH AMIRI MALIHEH. HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE QUIDDITY OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS AMONG MUSLIM LOGICIANS. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2017;-(19):65-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/251829/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHNAZ AMIRKHANI, ZEINAB BARKHORDARI, and MALIHEH POURSALEH AMIRI, “HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE QUIDDITY OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROPOSITIONS AMONG MUSLIM LOGICIANS,” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, vol. -, no. 19, pp. 65–86, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/251829/en

Related Journal Papers