IN CONTRAST TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS APPLICATION OF THE LAW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALEHI ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PRIVATE LAW Year:2018 | Volume:6 | Issue:23 Page(s): 117-140

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,431

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN CONTRAST TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS APPLICATION OF THE LAW

Author(s)

SALEHI ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GENERALQ1

SPECIALQ1

VALUEQ2

CONVEANCEQ1

SUSPICIONQ1

Abstract

The Concepts of GENERAL and SPECIAL are crucial issues in jurisprudence and statutes, that is, many provisions in statutes lay down on this basis. There is a well-known maxim which states that no GENERAL exits unless it is limited with a SPECIAL. The question of whether the GENERAL phrase is acceptable after narrow phrase and whether the ambiguity of SPECIAL conveyed to GENERAL as well as fulfillment of suspicious via practical rules in subjective suspicious and in GENERALity rule in non-suspicion at narrow phrase, is subject to great controversy and debates. This article deals with this issue by conducting a comparative study and considering the reasoning on which courts’ judgments are based. Then, it proposes some jurisprudential solutions for the purpose of convergence and finally, it concludes that there is obvious difference between collective GENERAL and floated GENERAL phrase and in subjective SUSPICION the wholly evidence, the wisdom as an independent source have VALUE and no difference among other verbal SPECIALs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALEHI, ALIREZA. (2018). IN CONTRAST TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS APPLICATION OF THE LAW. PRIVATE LAW, 6(23 ), 117-140. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/252722/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALEHI ALIREZA. IN CONTRAST TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS APPLICATION OF THE LAW. PRIVATE LAW[Internet]. 2018;6(23 ):117-140. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/252722/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA SALEHI, “IN CONTRAST TO GENERAL AND SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND ITS APPLICATION OF THE LAW,” PRIVATE LAW, vol. 6, no. 23 , pp. 117–140, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/252722/en

Related Journal Papers