CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKING IN IRAN BASED ON SNELLEN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE CASE STUDY ON THE JUSTICE SHARES DISTRIBUTION PLAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BARZEGAR EBRAHIM; HOSSEINZADEH SAYYAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STUDIES THE STATE Year:2018 | Volume:3 | Issue:12 Page(s): 107-143

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

561

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKING IN IRAN BASED ON SNELLEN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE CASE STUDY ON THE JUSTICE SHARES DISTRIBUTION PLAN

Author(s)

BARZEGAR EBRAHIM | HOSSEINZADEH SAYYAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GOVERNMENTQ2

JUSTICE SHARESQ2

POLICY MAKING SNELLEN HYBRID RATIONALITYQ1

Abstract

policymaking in Iran is done, because of the rupture of two-stage collection and execution, often different from what was promised, Academic communities due to the inevitable specialization gave analyses and different strategies and sometimes competing with their own perspective to policy-markers which does not have the capacity to repair the rupture. Therefore, the researchers by using multi-pattern analysis ' ' combined rationality' ' Snellen made it possible to criticize GOVERNMENT comprehensive policies in the scientific community, and subsequently provide consistent feedbacks having the strategic and repairing capacity to put on theire agendum (program).. Studying the case of the "Equity Distribution Shares Plan" in the form of Snellen's combined rationality, which includes four types of rationality (economic, political, legal, and professional), researchers are trying to resolve the foregoing paths of policy. The data collection method is a non-structured interview and data analysis method is analytical -structural. The statistical population of the study consisted of twenty interviewees who have been selected judiciously. Each field of rationality has been covered by five related experts. The findings show that the plan for the distribution of equity has been operationalized for reasons such as not paying attention to the requirements of practical and economic rationality and overlooking the requirements of different political rationality than promised. The proposed strategies also include legal, political, economic, and administrative areas.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BARZEGAR, EBRAHIM, & HOSSEINZADEH, SAYYAD. (2018). CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKING IN IRAN BASED ON SNELLEN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE CASE STUDY ON THE JUSTICE SHARES DISTRIBUTION PLAN. STUDIES THE STATE, 3(12 ), 107-143. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255330/en

Vancouver: Copy

BARZEGAR EBRAHIM, HOSSEINZADEH SAYYAD. CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKING IN IRAN BASED ON SNELLEN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE CASE STUDY ON THE JUSTICE SHARES DISTRIBUTION PLAN. STUDIES THE STATE[Internet]. 2018;3(12 ):107-143. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/255330/en

IEEE: Copy

EBRAHIM BARZEGAR, and SAYYAD HOSSEINZADEH, “CRITIQUE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY MAKING IN IRAN BASED ON SNELLEN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE CASE STUDY ON THE JUSTICE SHARES DISTRIBUTION PLAN,” STUDIES THE STATE, vol. 3, no. 12 , pp. 107–143, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/255330/en

Related Journal Papers