WHAT REMAINS OF NEW CLAIMS BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? SOME OBSERVATIONS IN LIGHT OF JUDGMENT OF THE ICJ IN AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZARI HADI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

694

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

WHAT REMAINS OF NEW CLAIMS BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? SOME OBSERVATIONS IN LIGHT OF JUDGMENT OF THE ICJ IN AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASE

Author(s)

AZARI HADI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ADDITIONAL OR NEW CLAIMSQ2

APPLICANTQ2

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICEQ2

APPLICATIONQ2

MODIFICATIONQ2

SUBMISSIONQ2

AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASEQ2

INCIDENTAL PROCEEDINGQ2

CONNECTIONQ2

JURISDICTIONQ2

ADMISSIBILITYQ2

RIGHT OF DEFENSEQ2

Abstract

To the question of whether to allow the APPLICANT to formulate the new (additional) claims in the course of proceedings, the Permanent Court of International Justice has responded affirmatively. The INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE seems to depart from the approach adopted by its predecessor, giving considerable preponderance to the limits of the claim as delimited by the terms of the APPLICATION, as well as giving a very narrow interpretation of the CONNECTION that must exist between the new claim and the one formulated in the APPLICATION. This is what makes (almost) impossible the SUBMISSION of an additional claim. The judgment of 30 November 2010, rendered in the merits of the case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo is the notable example of the APPLICATION of this approach. The Court emphasizes the disadvantages resulting from the SUBMISSION of new claims in the course of proceedings. We think that it will not be the case if it is recognized that the new claim is a real affirmative demand, and an INCIDENTAL PROCEEDING.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AZARI, HADI. (2013). WHAT REMAINS OF NEW CLAIMS BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? SOME OBSERVATIONS IN LIGHT OF JUDGMENT OF THE ICJ IN AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASE. INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, -(48), 183-204. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/261578/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZARI HADI. WHAT REMAINS OF NEW CLAIMS BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? SOME OBSERVATIONS IN LIGHT OF JUDGMENT OF THE ICJ IN AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASE. INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW[Internet]. 2013;-(48):183-204. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/261578/en

IEEE: Copy

HADI AZARI, “WHAT REMAINS OF NEW CLAIMS BEFORE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? SOME OBSERVATIONS IN LIGHT OF JUDGMENT OF THE ICJ IN AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO CASE,” INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, vol. -, no. 48, pp. 183–204, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/261578/en

Related Journal Papers