مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

870
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West

Pages

  55-80

Abstract

 Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of Reward to the public and offer of Reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of Reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that Reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of Contract or Unilateral Juridical Act or Common Causality. In law of the west, offer of Reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be Contractual. What is controversial is the offer of Reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the Contractual approach and others have adopted the Reward as a Unilateral Promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the Rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the Contract.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Dadmarzi, Sayyed Mahdi, & HEYDARI, AZAM. (2018). A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, 5(2 (16) ), 55-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/262170/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Dadmarzi Sayyed Mahdi, HEYDARI AZAM. A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW[Internet]. 2018;5(2 (16) ):55-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/262170/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Sayyed Mahdi Dadmarzi, and AZAM HEYDARI, “A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, vol. 5, no. 2 (16) , pp. 55–80, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/262170/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button