THE KANT-HEGEL CONFRONTATION IN THEORY AND CRITICISM OF FICTION AND THE NOVEL IN IRAN (1933-1969)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHOJASTEH FARAMARZ; SEDDIGHI MOSTAFA; FARASHAHINEZHAD YASER

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM Year:2017 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 31-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

697

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE KANT-HEGEL CONFRONTATION IN THEORY AND CRITICISM OF FICTION AND THE NOVEL IN IRAN (1933-1969)

Author(s)

KHOJASTEH FARAMARZ | SEDDIGHI MOSTAFA | FARASHAHINEZHAD YASER | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KANT

HEGEL

REALISM

FORMALISM

LITERARY CRITICISM

NOVEL

Abstract

The majority of magazines and reviews published between the early 1940s and the late 1960s in Iran were, in one way or another, linked to the Tudeh Party of Iran and, thus, left-leaning. Therefore, the ideas of the writers in these magazines were connected to HEGELian aesthetics, via Marxist aesthetics.Hegelian aesthetics subordinates artistic form to philosophical thought and concepts, and holds that the ultimate goal of art is to move towards philosophy and the production of thought. In Iran, critics such as Fatemeh Sayyah, Ehsan Tabari and others approved of the NOVEL only within the framework of committed REALISM. But in the early 60s, critics like Abolhassan Najafi and Houshang Golshiri gave priority to artistic form and narrative techniques for the first time. The present study explores these critics’ ideas and arguments with reference to the theories of KANT and HEGEL and demonstrates the influence of Western philosophy and theories of literature on Iranian critics. The study argues that in their criticisms, Sayyah and Tabari have more affinity with the ideas of HEGEL and HEGELians, while Najafi and Golshiri represent a type of FORMALISM rooted in KANT’s theories.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHOJASTEH, FARAMARZ, SEDDIGHI, MOSTAFA, & FARASHAHINEZHAD, YASER. (2017). THE KANT-HEGEL CONFRONTATION IN THEORY AND CRITICISM OF FICTION AND THE NOVEL IN IRAN (1933-1969). LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM, 1(2 ), 31-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/265577/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHOJASTEH FARAMARZ, SEDDIGHI MOSTAFA, FARASHAHINEZHAD YASER. THE KANT-HEGEL CONFRONTATION IN THEORY AND CRITICISM OF FICTION AND THE NOVEL IN IRAN (1933-1969). LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM[Internet]. 2017;1(2 ):31-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/265577/en

IEEE: Copy

FARAMARZ KHOJASTEH, MOSTAFA SEDDIGHI, and YASER FARASHAHINEZHAD, “THE KANT-HEGEL CONFRONTATION IN THEORY AND CRITICISM OF FICTION AND THE NOVEL IN IRAN (1933-1969),” LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM, vol. 1, no. 2 , pp. 31–56, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/265577/en

Related Journal Papers