COMPRATIVE STUDY OF STANDARDSOF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IRAN'S AND BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZAIEZADEH MOHAMMAD JAVAD; AKBARI EHSAN; ROUZITALAB MOHAMMAD MOHSEN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Administrative Law Year:2018 | Volume:5 | Issue:13 Page(s): 63-81

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,824

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPRATIVE STUDY OF STANDARDSOF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IRAN'S AND BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Author(s)

REZAIEZADEH MOHAMMAD JAVAD | AKBARI EHSAN | ROUZITALAB MOHAMMAD MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JUDICIAL REVIEW

ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

JURISDICTION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS

ILLIGALITY

Abstract

JUDICIAL REVIEW refers to administrative actions; i.e. controlling the actions and decisions by a system independent of administrative power. The most important guarantee is to realize the sovereignty of law in important administrative and guaranteeing laws against the transgression of public officials from the limit of JURISDICTION. The system of judicial supervision in both Iran and Britain is based on a centralized and decentralized pattern as each follows its own special administrative mechanisms. In Iran law, ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL has superior supervision over administrative action and decisions based on specific JURISDICTION they benefit from law, while JUDICIAL REVIEW over government’s actions in British law is exercised by public courts and based on ILLIGALITY, Irrationality and procedural impropriety.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZAIEZADEH, MOHAMMAD JAVAD, AKBARI, EHSAN, & ROUZITALAB, MOHAMMAD MOHSEN. (2018). COMPRATIVE STUDY OF STANDARDSOF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IRAN'S AND BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 5(13 ), 63-81. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/266017/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZAIEZADEH MOHAMMAD JAVAD, AKBARI EHSAN, ROUZITALAB MOHAMMAD MOHSEN. COMPRATIVE STUDY OF STANDARDSOF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IRAN'S AND BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW[Internet]. 2018;5(13 ):63-81. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/266017/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD JAVAD REZAIEZADEH, EHSAN AKBARI, and MOHAMMAD MOHSEN ROUZITALAB, “COMPRATIVE STUDY OF STANDARDSOF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN IRAN'S AND BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,” ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, vol. 5, no. 13 , pp. 63–81, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/266017/en

Related Journal Papers