مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,017
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE VALIDITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN AFGHAN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Pages

  155-188

Abstract

 According to the Afghan Constitution, in the absence of relevant statutory laws, courts shall refer to HANAFI JURISPRUDENCE. However, there are other explicit and implied constitutional conditions, which should be taken into consideration, including compliance with the PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT, which as one of the most fundamental principles of modern CRIMINAL LAW is guaranteed not only in the current Constitution but also in all the six most recent Afghan constitutions. However, Article 1 of the Afghan PENAL CODE of 1976 stipulates that it regulates only Tazirat punishments and refers Hodud, Qisas and Diyat punishments to HANAFI JURISPRUDENCE. This article is repugnant to these explicit and implied constitutional conditions, and as a “weak law” can be ignored. Generally speaking, although Sharia enjoys a prominent position in the Afghan Constitution, its status is different from the IRANian Constitution, which governs generally and absolutely over all articles of THE CONSTITUTION itself, as well as over all other laws and regulations. Besides, the legislator’s approach in the subsequent articles of the Afghan PENAL CODE of 1976 shows that even the legislator himself did not believe deeply in his own Article 1. Moreover, among recent laws, there are some examples that implicitly confirm the fact that Article 1 is not valid.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SADR TOUHID KHANEH, MOHAMMAD. (2017). THE VALIDITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN AFGHAN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH, 4(17 ), 155-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/266579/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SADR TOUHID KHANEH MOHAMMAD. THE VALIDITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN AFGHAN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;4(17 ):155-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/266579/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD SADR TOUHID KHANEH, “THE VALIDITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN AFGHAN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS,” CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH, vol. 4, no. 17 , pp. 155–188, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/266579/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button