AN ANALYSIS OF IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY IN PROVING SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF FOUNDATIONS)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAKIM SEYED MOHAMMAD HASAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FIGHE MOQARAN Year:2016 | Volume:4 | Issue:7 Page(s): 13-27

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

455

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS OF IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY IN PROVING SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF FOUNDATIONS)

Author(s)

HAKIM SEYED MOHAMMAD HASAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY

STRUCTURE OF JURISPRUDENTIAL ARGUMENT

SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU

Abstract

With its detailed and problem-oriented procedures, the comparative methodology is among the most important issues in methodology. It is also one of the most recent topics in the field of Islamic jurisprudence and, until the contemporary age, had been almost completely neglected by jurisprudents. Comparing issues in the philosophy of jurisprudents such as Ibn Hazm, who both experienced a religious conversion and was the leader of a religious sect, can contain critical methodological implications. In this study, we aim to analyze the issue of SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (ablution) which is a disputed issue and over which Ibn Hazm argues against all Sunni jurisprudents. In this light, we consider possible methodological implications for jurisprudential interpretation and the quality of interacting with the text. From among the important points that can be extracted from the methodological discussion on this issue, we can point out the quality of understanding and interpreting the literal meaning of texts; the process of discarding impossible meanings; historical analysis, its use in ruling out contradictory meanings and its effect on solving intertextual conflicts; and the Role of extracting the denotations of texts in confirming jurisprudential orders.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAKIM, SEYED MOHAMMAD HASAN. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY IN PROVING SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF FOUNDATIONS). FIGHE MOQARAN, 4(7 ), 13-27. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/266988/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAKIM SEYED MOHAMMAD HASAN. AN ANALYSIS OF IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY IN PROVING SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF FOUNDATIONS). FIGHE MOQARAN[Internet]. 2016;4(7 ):13-27. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/266988/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MOHAMMAD HASAN HAKIM, “AN ANALYSIS OF IBN HAZM’S METHODOLOGY IN PROVING SLEEP AS AN INVALIDATOR OF WUDU (STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF FOUNDATIONS),” FIGHE MOQARAN, vol. 4, no. 7 , pp. 13–27, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/266988/en

Related Journal Papers