مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,291
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLAMAH BALAGHI AND BINT AL-SHATI'S METHOD AND RULES OF INTERPRETATION

Author(s)

AHMADINEZHAD FATIMAH | HUSSEINIZADEH SEYYED ABDULRASOUL | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  159-180

Abstract

 Nowadays, we observe many and different commentaries of THE HOLY QURAN, each indicating its author's method, principles, rules and presumptions. Among them, Sheikh Muhammad Jawad Balaghi, a Shia theologian, commentator and the author of Ala' Al- Rahman (Blessings of the All-Merciful) Commentary and Ayesha BINT AL-SHATI, Sunny researcher, commentator and the author of AL-TAFSIR AL-BAYANI (Demonstrative Commentary) are contemporary commentators who have interpreted some chapters of THE HOLY QURAN according to particular method and rules. Using an analytical-descriptive method, the present paper compares some of their rules and method of interpretation in aforementioned commentaries. One of the most important research findings indicates their common commitment to the interpretation of THE HOLY QURAN by itself. There are, however, some differences in their method of interpretation in terms of using traditions, explaining Quranic words and expressions, using historical trends and their approach to scientific commentary. Despite their differences in the interpretive rules of recitation, attention to the order of descent of chapters and thematic interpretation, they have common or similar views about the authenticity and criterion of the Quran in literary sciences, the validity of generality of word and using the context of Quranic verses.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHMADINEZHAD, FATIMAH, & HUSSEINIZADEH, SEYYED ABDULRASOUL. (2016). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLAMAH BALAGHI AND BINT AL-SHATI'S METHOD AND RULES OF INTERPRETATION. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 2(1 (3) ), 159-180. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/267072/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHMADINEZHAD FATIMAH, HUSSEINIZADEH SEYYED ABDULRASOUL. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLAMAH BALAGHI AND BINT AL-SHATI'S METHOD AND RULES OF INTERPRETATION. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2016;2(1 (3) ):159-180. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/267072/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FATIMAH AHMADINEZHAD, and SEYYED ABDULRASOUL HUSSEINIZADEH, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLAMAH BALAGHI AND BINT AL-SHATI'S METHOD AND RULES OF INTERPRETATION,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 2, no. 1 (3) , pp. 159–180, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/267072/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button