THE COMPARISON AND CRITICISM OF THE CONCEPT OF METAPHOR IN ALLAMAH TABATABAII AND SHANGHITI'S VIEW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAZIZADEH KAZEM; AYAZI SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI; MALEK AL SHOARAII LEILA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES Year:2017 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 (4) Page(s): 89-110

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

759

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON AND CRITICISM OF THE CONCEPT OF METAPHOR IN ALLAMAH TABATABAII AND SHANGHITI'S VIEW

Author(s)

GHAZIZADEH KAZEM | AYAZI SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI | MALEK AL SHOARAII LEILA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

METAPHOR

TRUTH

THE SPIRIT OF MEANING

TABATABAII

SHANGHITI

Abstract

Employing METAPHOR, irony, figurative expressions and other rhetorical figures is one of the most obvious expressive miracles of the Holy Quran, on which men of letters and rhetoric are unanimous. Commentators, however, disagree on their employment in the Holy Quran. Allamah TABATABAII, a Shia commentator, accepts their employment while SHANGHITI, a contemporary Salafi commentator, denies it, though both of them agree on the real employment of the Quranic terms as a principle and reject literal METAPHOR and figurative expressions as far as possible. Allamah TABATABAII, however, believes in employing METAPHOR if the literal aspect of the term contradicts with rational meaning and its context, and tries to justify the relevant and real employment of the Quranic terms through proposing different theories. It seems that the theory of "the spirit of meaning" proposed by Allamah TABATABAII and the theory of "rejection of METAPHOR" proposed by SHANGHITI converge in upper level, but have fundamental differences. The present paper reviews and compares these theories. Allamah TABATABAII does not totally reject METAPHOR, but limits its employment in the Holy Quran by relying on the theory of "setting terms for the spirits of meanings", and talks about METAPHOR and irony wherever a contradictory example exists. SHANGHITI, however, basically rejects METAPHOR and irony on the basis of a theological approach.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAZIZADEH, KAZEM, AYAZI, SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI, & MALEK AL SHOARAII, LEILA. (2017). THE COMPARISON AND CRITICISM OF THE CONCEPT OF METAPHOR IN ALLAMAH TABATABAII AND SHANGHITI'S VIEW. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 2(2 (4) ), 89-110. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/267097/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAZIZADEH KAZEM, AYAZI SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI, MALEK AL SHOARAII LEILA. THE COMPARISON AND CRITICISM OF THE CONCEPT OF METAPHOR IN ALLAMAH TABATABAII AND SHANGHITI'S VIEW. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2017;2(2 (4) ):89-110. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/267097/en

IEEE: Copy

KAZEM GHAZIZADEH, SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI AYAZI, and LEILA MALEK AL SHOARAII, “THE COMPARISON AND CRITICISM OF THE CONCEPT OF METAPHOR IN ALLAMAH TABATABAII AND SHANGHITI'S VIEW,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 2, no. 2 (4) , pp. 89–110, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/267097/en

Related Journal Papers