Reflecting the differences between rationalist and narrative approaches in the analysis of the idea of al-Badā ’ Reading the Two Commentaries of al-Kulayni's kitab al-Kā fī in the Safavid Era

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARAHI MOHAMMAD MAHDI; Shahidi Rouhollah; RAHMAN SETAYESH MOHAMMAD KAZEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO QURAN AND HADITH STUDIES Year:2020 | Volume:25 | Issue:66 Page(s): 241-264

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

405

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Reflecting the differences between rationalist and narrative approaches in the analysis of the idea of al-Badā ’ Reading the Two Commentaries of al-Kulayni's kitab al-Kā fī in the Safavid Era

Author(s)

FARAHI MOHAMMAD MAHDI | Shahidi Rouhollah | RAHMAN SETAYESH MOHAMMAD KAZEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Philosophical Rationalism

Narrativeism

Badā’

Mulla Sadra

Mohammad Taghi Majlisi

Abstract

Thinkers have taken different approaches to religious narratives and propositions. Since each approach has different effects and consequences, it is necessary to examine them and to identify their different consequences. The two main approaches in dealing with religious narratives and propositions are the philosophical rationalist approach and the narrative approach. In this study, we want to use a comparative method to examine and implement Mulla Sadra’ s approach as a representative of the school of Philosophical Rationalism and the Majlesi’ s approach as the representative of the school of narrative about the concept of ‘ Badā ’ ’ in the book of Usul-e Kā fi. In this way, we want to gain a better understanding of each of these two approaches and to highlight their differences and distinctions. These two thinkers lived in the Safavid era, and their theoretical approaches indicate the intellectual confrontation between the two currents of rationalism and Narrativeism in that period. The study hypothesis is that these two approaches differ in components such as how to explain religious teachings, how to expand the problem, how to be sure of expression or caution, and how to deal with confusing narratives. However, one can also see commonalities between the owners of the two approaches in confronting narratives; similarities such as avoiding the denial of narrations, relying on Ta’ wil, and confronting narrations based on presuppositions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FARAHI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI, Shahidi, Rouhollah, & RAHMAN SETAYESH, MOHAMMAD KAZEM. (2020). Reflecting the differences between rationalist and narrative approaches in the analysis of the idea of al-Badā ’ Reading the Two Commentaries of al-Kulayni's kitab al-Kā fī in the Safavid Era. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO QURAN AND HADITH STUDIES, 25(66 ), 241-264. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270281/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARAHI MOHAMMAD MAHDI, Shahidi Rouhollah, RAHMAN SETAYESH MOHAMMAD KAZEM. Reflecting the differences between rationalist and narrative approaches in the analysis of the idea of al-Badā ’ Reading the Two Commentaries of al-Kulayni's kitab al-Kā fī in the Safavid Era. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO QURAN AND HADITH STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;25(66 ):241-264. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270281/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MAHDI FARAHI, Rouhollah Shahidi, and MOHAMMAD KAZEM RAHMAN SETAYESH, “Reflecting the differences between rationalist and narrative approaches in the analysis of the idea of al-Badā ’ Reading the Two Commentaries of al-Kulayni's kitab al-Kā fī in the Safavid Era,” JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO QURAN AND HADITH STUDIES, vol. 25, no. 66 , pp. 241–264, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270281/en

Related Journal Papers