COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NIAZI F.; FAKHERIFARD A.; HOSSEINZADEH DALIR A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE Year:2008 | Volume:18 | Issue:2 Page(s): 11-25

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,050

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER)

Author(s)

NIAZI F. | FAKHERIFARD A. | HOSSEINZADEH DALIR A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLARK METHODQ3

HYDRAULIC FLOOD ROUTINGQ3

HYDROLOGIC FLOOD ROUTINGQ3

KAROON RIVERQ3

MUSKINGUM METHODQ3

Abstract

In general, there are two sets of methods for flood routing calculations in rivers. These methods are classified as hydraulic and hydrologic scheme. Flood routing is of great importance to design, construct, and manage the flood preserved structures in order to study their effects on flood waves treatment in rivers, short time prediction of flood, prediction of river treatment after its situation changed and synthetic unit hydrograph generation are also accessible through flood routing. In this research, two approaches of flood routing i.e. Clark and MUSKINGUM METHODs, were described and applied for a reach between Godarlandar and Gotvand gauging stations of KAROON RIVER; then their functions were investigated and compared. Eleven input hydrographs in Godarlandar and their output hydrographs in Gotvand station were selected and the calibration of the study methods as well as their goodness of fit test performed through selected hydrographs using error analysis. The criteria used for models evaluation, included coefficient of determination (R2), standard error (SE), Nash- Sutcliffe efficiency (E), error in peak flow (Qp%) and error in time to peak (Tp%). The results showed that both Clark and MUSKINGUM METHODs under estimated the peak and the time to peak as compared with the observed values whereas the result of evaluations showed that the simulation of output hydrographs with MUSKINGUM METHOD was closer to observed than that of CLARK METHOD.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NIAZI, F., FAKHERIFARD, A., & HOSSEINZADEH DALIR, A.. (2008). COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE, 18(2), 11-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28640/en

Vancouver: Copy

NIAZI F., FAKHERIFARD A., HOSSEINZADEH DALIR A.. COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE[Internet]. 2008;18(2):11-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28640/en

IEEE: Copy

F. NIAZI, A. FAKHERIFARD, and A. HOSSEINZADEH DALIR, “COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER),” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 11–25, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28640/en

Related Journal Papers