مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,044
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CLARK AND MUSKINGUM METHODS IN RIVER FLOOD ROUTING (CASE STUDY: KAROON RIVER)

Pages

  11-25

Abstract

 In general, there are two sets of methods for flood routing calculations in rivers. These methods are classified as hydraulic and hydrologic scheme. Flood routing is of great importance to design, construct, and manage the flood preserved structures in order to study their effects on flood waves treatment in rivers, short time prediction of flood, prediction of river treatment after its situation changed and synthetic unit hydrograph generation are also accessible through flood routing. In this research, two approaches of flood routing i.e. Clark and MUSKINGUM METHODs, were described and applied for a reach between Godarlandar and Gotvand gauging stations of KAROON RIVER; then their functions were investigated and compared. Eleven input hydrographs in Godarlandar and their output hydrographs in Gotvand station were selected and the calibration of the study methods as well as their goodness of fit test performed through selected hydrographs using error analysis. The criteria used for models evaluation, included coefficient of determination (R2), standard error (SE), Nash- Sutcliffe efficiency (E), error in peak flow (Qp%) and error in time to peak (Tp%). The results showed that both Clark and MUSKINGUM METHODs under estimated the peak and the time to peak as compared with the observed values whereas the result of evaluations showed that the simulation of output hydrographs with MUSKINGUM METHOD was closer to observed than that of CLARK METHOD.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button