مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,295
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTICERCUS BOVIS IN SLAUGHTERED CATTLE

Pages

  177-180

Abstract

 Objective: To present a more accurate method for DIAGNOSIS of Cysticercus bovis in slaughtered CATTLE. Project: Slaughterhouse study. Animal: 3436 CATTLE. Method: To present a more accurate method for DIAGNOSIS of C.bovis in slaughtered CATTLE 1812 CATTLE were examined at meat inspection using traditional method. Meanwhile by using standard method for detection of c.bovis at meat inspection in South Africa, Germany and England 145 CATTLE for each region were examined. In each method the percentage of infection with C.bovis was determined. In traditional method heart, external and internal master and triceps muscles were inspected. Whereas for the method used in Germany and England, heart, external and internal master, oesophagus, diaphragm, tongue and for that of South Africa in addition to these, triceps was also inspected. The best, among the method used, was selected and according to the latter 1189 carcasses were examined. If the accuracy of selected method was statistically superior or similar to the best method, thus it was considered as an alternative or replacement method to the traditional method. Results: By examining of 1182 CATTLE at meat inspection using traditional method 47  carcasses(2.6%) harboured c.bovis in different organs, whereas using standard method, used in Germany, England and South Africa 7.6% , 6.9% and 6.9% of examined CATTLE were found to be infected with' C.bovis. There were significant differences between traditional method and standard methods of three different countries us in X2 test. Standard method used in Germany was more accurate than the others, thus it was chosen as our selected method by which 1189 CATTLE were examined of which ninety CATTLE (7.6%) were found to be infected with C.bovis, an infection rate comparable to German method. Thus it could be suggested as an alternative or replacement to the traditional method.    

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ESLAMI, ALI, MESHGI, B., BAHONAR, A.R., & MOOSAVI, S.A.. (2005). COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTICERCUS BOVIS IN SLAUGHTERED CATTLE. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 60(2), 177-180. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/34676/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ESLAMI ALI, MESHGI B., BAHONAR A.R., MOOSAVI S.A.. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTICERCUS BOVIS IN SLAUGHTERED CATTLE. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH[Internet]. 2005;60(2):177-180. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/34676/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI ESLAMI, B. MESHGI, A.R. BAHONAR, and S.A. MOOSAVI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTICERCUS BOVIS IN SLAUGHTERED CATTLE,” JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 177–180, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/34676/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops

  • No record.





  • Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button