ANTIBIOTICS REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHOSH G.C.; HANAMOTO S.; YAMASHITA N.; HUANG X.; TANAKA H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: POLLUTION Year:2016 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 Page(s): 131-139

Download Full-Text

View:

256

Download:

277

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANTIBIOTICS REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS

Author(s)

Keywords

ANTIBIOTICS

EFFLUENT

INFLUENT

SEWAGE TREATMENT

Abstract

This study investigated the occurrence and removal of 12 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) at four sewage treatment plants (STPs): two STPs in Kyoto, Japan and two STPs in Beijing, China. The STPs differed in design and operation conditions, utilized a variety of secondary treatment processes. The antibiotics were frequently detected in influents and effluents, and ranged from ng/L up to lower mg/L. In influent, clarithromycin (1.1–1.6 mg/L) and levofloxacin (3.6–6.8 mg/L) were detected in the highest concentration in Japanese and Chinese STPs, respectively. The overall elimination of the antibiotics were differed between STPs and ranged from negative to>90%. These data demonstrate that there are detectable levels of antibiotics are discharging from STPs, and only some of these antibiotics are being removed in a significant proportion by STPs. It was also observed that biological nutrient removal based sewage treatment processes (anaerobic– anoxic–oxic: A2O; and anoxic–oxic: AO) have relatively higher antibiotics removal efficiencies than oxidation ditch (OD) processes.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHOSH, G.C., HANAMOTO, S., YAMASHITA, N., HUANG, X., & TANAKA, H.. (2016). ANTIBIOTICS REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS. POLLUTION, 2(2), 131-139. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/348618/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHOSH G.C., HANAMOTO S., YAMASHITA N., HUANG X., TANAKA H.. ANTIBIOTICS REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS. POLLUTION[Internet]. 2016;2(2):131-139. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/348618/en

IEEE: Copy

G.C. GHOSH, S. HANAMOTO, N. YAMASHITA, X. HUANG, and H. TANAKA, “ANTIBIOTICS REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS,” POLLUTION, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/348618/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops