A Comparative Study of the Validity of Open Contract in National Legal Systems and International Trade law

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ABDIPOUR FARD EBRAHIM; Ostadi Mona

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Comparative Law Year:2018 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 (109) Page(s): 131-154

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

568

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of the Validity of Open Contract in National Legal Systems and International Trade law

Author(s)

ABDIPOUR FARD EBRAHIM | Ostadi Mona | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ValidityQ2

Open ContractQ1

TermQ2

AgreementQ2

IintentionQ2

Abstract

Sometimes, the parties of a contract for any reason do not want or cannot agree about some Terms of the contract such as the quantity or quality of the object, the price, the method of the payment, duration of contract at the time of conclusion of the contract. Therefore, they conclude the contract and postpone the deTermination of these Terms or only rely on setting up a criterion to deTermine it. There are disAgreements over the Validity of this type of contract that is refferedto as Open Contract. According to the traditional doctrine, one of the basic principles of Validity of a contract is the need to resolving of ambiguity of contract and if a deal has vague and open provisions, it would be void for reasons such as lack of sufficient Agreement, absence of intention, the impossibility of completing the contract, the chance of gain or loss in a contract and conflicting with reasonable men practices and public policy. But the analysis of these arguments shows that none of them are perfect and sound reasons for inValidity of this kind of contract and there are logical answers to them. Moreover, common interest, the necessity of maintenance of legal relations and their stability, the needs and requirements of commerce and economic efficiency require that this kind of contract must not be void when some of its elements and conditions are open whereas the ambiguity of the contract is not such as to lead to a dispute.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ABDIPOUR FARD, EBRAHIM, & Ostadi, Mona. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Validity of Open Contract in National Legal Systems and International Trade law. COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID), 14(1 (109) ), 131-154. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/363436/en

Vancouver: Copy

ABDIPOUR FARD EBRAHIM, Ostadi Mona. A Comparative Study of the Validity of Open Contract in National Legal Systems and International Trade law. COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID)[Internet]. 2018;14(1 (109) ):131-154. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/363436/en

IEEE: Copy

EBRAHIM ABDIPOUR FARD, and Mona Ostadi, “A Comparative Study of the Validity of Open Contract in National Legal Systems and International Trade law,” COMPARATIVE LAW (NAMEH-YE MOFID), vol. 14, no. 1 (109) , pp. 131–154, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/363436/en

Related Journal Papers