مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,029
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Study of the Viewpoints of Allameh Ma’ refat and Allameh Tabatabaii on Making Reference to the Quran and Narratives for Exegesis

Pages

  7-32

Abstract

 One of the important issues raised in exegetic methods is the “ Sources of exegesis” . These sources either originate from Wahy (revelation) and its redefinition or are extracted from the rational and experimental efforts of humans during centuries. The differences in exegetic methods are related to the commentators’ choice of source. By scrutinizing the viewpoints of Allameh Ma’ refat about the exegetic sources of a work, this research paper attempts to find out the distinctions between his and Allameh Tabatabaii’ s views in this regard. As the primary source of exegesis, Allemeh Ma’ refat is more concerned about narratives and other exegetic books while Allameh Tabatabaii focuses on the Quran. In order to answer the research question, a comparative analysis has been made between the views of Allameh Ma’ refat and Allameh Tabatabaii on the Quran and divine and historical narratives including the narrative from Prophet Mohammad and Ahl al-Bayt. By analysis of arguments regarding the validity of each of the above sources, their commonalities, and also advantages, it becomes evident that the disagreement between these two commentators is related to the intermingled state of instrumental and referencing sciences in exegesis, difference in the definitions of exegesis, and also lack of differentiation between the terms exegesis and elucidation of the Quran.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BEHJATPOOR, ABDOLKARIM, & Ghamarzadeh, Mohsen. (2018). Comparative Study of the Viewpoints of Allameh Ma’ refat and Allameh Tabatabaii on Making Reference to the Quran and Narratives for Exegesis. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 4(1 (7) ), 7-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/365095/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BEHJATPOOR ABDOLKARIM, Ghamarzadeh Mohsen. Comparative Study of the Viewpoints of Allameh Ma’ refat and Allameh Tabatabaii on Making Reference to the Quran and Narratives for Exegesis. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2018;4(1 (7) ):7-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/365095/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABDOLKARIM BEHJATPOOR, and Mohsen Ghamarzadeh, “Comparative Study of the Viewpoints of Allameh Ma’ refat and Allameh Tabatabaii on Making Reference to the Quran and Narratives for Exegesis,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 4, no. 1 (7) , pp. 7–32, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/365095/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button