Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DANESHSHAHRAKI HABIBOLLAH; KHOSROWPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN; Gholamnejad Fatemeh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES Year:2018 | Volume:4 | Issue:1 (7) Page(s): 181-202

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

555

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer

Author(s)

DANESHSHAHRAKI HABIBOLLAH | KHOSROWPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN | Gholamnejad Fatemeh | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Hermeneutics

Mulla Sadra

Gadamer

Abstract

Philosophical Hermeneutics which means ontology of understanding delves into the ontological foundations of understanding and its existential conditions from philosophical perspective. Gadamer as a representative of this school of thought developed Hermeneutics from the realm of methodology into ontology. The present study entitled “ A Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer” revealed that many hermeneutic features of Gadamer such as essence of understanding, ontology of text and interpreter, multiplicity of understandings, and the commentator’ s presumptions are evident in the perception of Mulla Sadra from the Holy Quran. However, their Hermeneutics are basically different in each of the above points. More importantly, Mulla Sadra believes that the Quran is determined by God so he does not believe in relativism which is the outcome of Gadamer’ s Hermeneutics. In fact, Mulla Sadra believes in the cautious integration of meaning horizon between the commentator and the text in accordance with the author’ s will, so he regards accurate understanding of the texts achievable relying on the key role of the commentator on the one hand, and the author’ s knowledge on the other hand.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DANESHSHAHRAKI, HABIBOLLAH, KHOSROWPANAH, ABDOLHOSSEIN, & Gholamnejad, Fatemeh. (2018). Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 4(1 (7) ), 181-202. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/365097/en

Vancouver: Copy

DANESHSHAHRAKI HABIBOLLAH, KHOSROWPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN, Gholamnejad Fatemeh. Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2018;4(1 (7) ):181-202. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/365097/en

IEEE: Copy

HABIBOLLAH DANESHSHAHRAKI, ABDOLHOSSEIN KHOSROWPANAH, and Fatemeh Gholamnejad, “Comparative Study of the Hermeneutics of Mulla Sadra and Gadamer,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 4, no. 1 (7) , pp. 181–202, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/365097/en

Related Journal Papers