Extrovertive Evidentialism: A critique of Two Stream Justification Thesis

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMZADEH OMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2019 | Volume:18 | Issue:57 Page(s): 127-148

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

336

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Extrovertive Evidentialism: A critique of Two Stream Justification Thesis

Author(s)

KARIMZADEH OMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

evidence underminingQ1

judgment underminingQ1

the doctrine of two streams of justificationQ1

evidentialismQ1

epistemic intuitionQ1

Abstract

Some contemporary epistemologists claim that there are two different kinds of epistemic defeat that are called evidence undermining and judgment undermining respectively. Using a thesis called two streams of justification thesis, they argue that in the first case one's justification is completely undermined while in the second case, despite the fact that one loses some part of the justification, they are justified to believe in a proposition to some degree. In this paper, after focusing on the argument proposed in Rotondo (2013) (as an instance of this camp of epistemologists), I show that different articulations of the thesis should be distinguished. I call them the first articulation and the second one and then I show that the second articulation is more plausible. Then I introduce a specific formulation of the evidentialism thesis and argue that despite its own problem, it has an advantage over the second articulation. I introduce my preferred justificatory thesis to rectify the problem at the end. The preferred justificatory thesis determines the necessary and the sufficient conditions for a person to be justified in believing in a proposition. Accepting the preferred justificatory thesis is equal to rejecting Rotondo's claim.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMZADEH, OMID. (2019). Extrovertive Evidentialism: A critique of Two Stream Justification Thesis. AYENEH MAREFAT, 18(57 ), 127-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/366730/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMZADEH OMID. Extrovertive Evidentialism: A critique of Two Stream Justification Thesis. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2019;18(57 ):127-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/366730/en

IEEE: Copy

OMID KARIMZADEH, “Extrovertive Evidentialism: A critique of Two Stream Justification Thesis,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. 18, no. 57 , pp. 127–148, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/366730/en

Related Journal Papers