Sabzawari and the criticism of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin's argument for substantial motion

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shidanshid Hussein Ali; Tavakkoli Mohammad Hadi

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Sophia Perennis Year:2019 | Volume:16 | Issue:35 Page(s): 97-119

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

315

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Sabzawari and the criticism of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin's argument for substantial motion

Author(s)

Shidanshid Hussein Ali | Tavakkoli Mohammad Hadi | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Sabzawari substantial motionQ1

Sadr al-Muta’allihinQ2

analyticQ1

causation Murtaza MutahhariQ1

Abstract

One of the arguments advanced by Sadr al-Muta’ allihin to prove the substantial motion is the argument through the mutual implication between nature and its effects and movements. Sabzawari has opposed this argument, and regarded it as a merely polemical proof which is compatible with the principles of Illuminationist philosophy, and incompatible with the foundations of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin himself. The objections raised by Sabzawari shows that this argument in its Sadrian presentation is not compelling. Murtaza Mutahhari has tried to turn this argument into a compelling argument by reconstructing and revising it. This reconstruction, although it is ambiguous and is not completely compatible with Sadrian presentation, makes the scientific discussion of the above mentioned argument clearer and more upgraded (especially if it is refereed on the basis of analytic causation). But, firstly, this progress does not show the falsehood of Sabzawari's objections and considerations about the Sadrian version, and secondly, what has opened up the new horizons and promoted this discussion is the very objections and considerations made by Sabzawari.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shidanshid, Hussein Ali, & Tavakkoli, Mohammad Hadi. (2019). Sabzawari and the criticism of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin's argument for substantial motion. THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS), 16(35 ), 97-119. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/368411/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shidanshid Hussein Ali, Tavakkoli Mohammad Hadi. Sabzawari and the criticism of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin's argument for substantial motion. THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS)[Internet]. 2019;16(35 ):97-119. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/368411/en

IEEE: Copy

Hussein Ali Shidanshid, and Mohammad Hadi Tavakkoli, “Sabzawari and the criticism of Sadr al-Muta’ allihin's argument for substantial motion,” THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS), vol. 16, no. 35 , pp. 97–119, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/368411/en

Related Journal Papers