Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Assaran Qommi Hossein; DIRBAZ ASGAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2019 | Volume:20 | Issue:4 (78) Page(s): 47-68

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

363

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel

Author(s)

Assaran Qommi Hossein | DIRBAZ ASGAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Allamah TabatabaiQ2

Gabriel MarcelQ1

intellectQ2

intellectionQ2

thinkingQ1

initial thoughtQ1

secondary thoughtQ1

Abstract

In this article we strive to study the position of intellection and thinking in belief-related issues according to Alamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel. The position and function of the intellect in belief-related issues has always been a point of focus of intellectuals and philosophers and has had a decisive role in determining the path of theology. Allamah Tabatabai and Marcel have also given special attention to belief-related issues and intellection and its position regarding these issues. Marcel criticizes the type of intellection regarding belief-related issues when encountering the complexity of these issues and presents a new way of thinking which is specific and personal and is instrumental in understanding belief-related realities. According to Marcel, there is an essential difference between belief-related issues and logical issues and abstract thinking is particular to logical issues; but Allamah presents the domain of this thinking to be much more extensive by considering the intellect to be independent in understanding realities, so that belief-related thinking comes under intellectual thinking. He considers the position of intellect to be very high by considering the authority of the intellect to be essential and definitive and in contrast to Marcel, he believes that the difference between religious denomination and philosophy is a method and they both seek a shared goal which is understanding realities. The path followed in this article is to first explain the views of both philosophers regarding the topic and then comparing them with each other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Assaran Qommi, Hossein, & DIRBAZ, ASGAR. (2019). Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 20(4 (78) ), 47-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/372268/en

Vancouver: Copy

Assaran Qommi Hossein, DIRBAZ ASGAR. Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;20(4 (78) ):47-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/372268/en

IEEE: Copy

Hossein Assaran Qommi, and ASGAR DIRBAZ, “Reasoning and Reflection Regarding Issues of Faith: a Comparison between the Views of Allamah Tabatabai and Gabriel Marcel,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 20, no. 4 (78) , pp. 47–68, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/372268/en

Related Journal Papers