مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

334
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

150
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Study of Jalal al-Din Davani’ s View Regarding the Relationship between Possible Beings and the Necessary Being: Dependency or Relationality?

Author(s)

Zare Ilahe | Jevareshkian Abbas | KAKAEI QASEM | Hosseini Shahroudi Sayyed Morteza | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  25-46

Abstract

 According to Sadra, the relationship between possible beings and the Necessary Being is dependency. He believes that all other Muslim philosophers before him, including Jalal al-Din Davani understood this relationship to be relational. However, Davani, who in his works holds that the relation between the cause and the effect is a kind of “ attribution” , explains this relation in two different forms, the first of which is known as the theory of Zawq al-Ta'alluh (Inclination to Divinity); from his views in this regard one can mostly conclude the relationality of possible beings. In the second form he uses the concept of emanation instead of causality and the notion of the source of attributions (Um al-Nisab) to more precisely explain the concept of “ attribution” and considers it to be synonymous with manifestation and emanation in a way that one can say Davani's view corresponds to that of Sadra concerning personal unity. In this paper, firstly it is shown that the second approach to Davani's view is a more complete and precise one and secondly, it is concluded that two matters caused Sadra to believe that Davani considered possible beings to be relational beings: Davani’ s unsuccessful explanation of his intended meaning and Sadra’ s inattention to the second form of the explanation of “ attribution” .

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Zare, Ilahe, Jevareshkian, Abbas, KAKAEI, QASEM, & Hosseini Shahroudi, Sayyed Morteza. (2019). A Study of Jalal al-Din Davani’ s View Regarding the Relationship between Possible Beings and the Necessary Being: Dependency or Relationality?. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 21(1 (79) ), 25-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/372830/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Zare Ilahe, Jevareshkian Abbas, KAKAEI QASEM, Hosseini Shahroudi Sayyed Morteza. A Study of Jalal al-Din Davani’ s View Regarding the Relationship between Possible Beings and the Necessary Being: Dependency or Relationality?. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;21(1 (79) ):25-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/372830/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Ilahe Zare, Abbas Jevareshkian, QASEM KAKAEI, and Sayyed Morteza Hosseini Shahroudi, “A Study of Jalal al-Din Davani’ s View Regarding the Relationship between Possible Beings and the Necessary Being: Dependency or Relationality?,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 21, no. 1 (79) , pp. 25–46, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/372830/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button