مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

303
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

128
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Necessity, Impossibility or Possibility of Substantial Motion from the Viewpoint of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra

Pages

  77-97

Abstract

 The category of Motion is one of the most important philosophical and scientific issues has been studied in philosophical ontology since Aristotle until now. Ibn Sina has also discussed movement and has proved movement in some accidental categories. But he refused to accept substantial movement. Mulla Sadra also accepts the Motion in all categories, and while responding to the problems about substantial movement, for the first time in the history of philosophy, he proved the moton in essence by applying his ontological foundations. This article answers the question of how Necessity and Possibility/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">ImPossibility can be met in one proposition. Why does Ibn Sina believe in Possibility/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">ImPossibility of substantial movement while it is necessary for Mulla Sadra? By qualitative content analysis of both views, we have come to the conclusion that given the philosophical foundations and ontological presuppositions, there is an acknowledgment of the theory of substantial movement in the views of philosophers before Mulla Sadra, in particular IbnSina. But due to the intertwining of the discussion of transformation in quiddity with the movement in the existence or ambiguity in quality of substantial movement, there is a dualism between Ibn Sina's and Mulla Sadra's views. But given these two approaches and whether essential forms can safeguard the unity of the matter or not, we came to the conclusion that in Ibn Sina's view, substantial movement is possible, and it is not impossible.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHANAZARI, JAFAR, & Hadi, Marziyah. (2020). The Necessity, Impossibility or Possibility of Substantial Motion from the Viewpoint of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 9(17 ), 77-97. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/376011/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHANAZARI JAFAR, Hadi Marziyah. The Necessity, Impossibility or Possibility of Substantial Motion from the Viewpoint of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2020;9(17 ):77-97. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/376011/en

    IEEE: Copy

    JAFAR SHANAZARI, and Marziyah Hadi, “The Necessity, Impossibility or Possibility of Substantial Motion from the Viewpoint of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 9, no. 17 , pp. 77–97, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/376011/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button