مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,697
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Demolition without a Final Ruling, Infringement or Explicit Law

Pages

  243-264

Abstract

 ‘ The Conservation of the Use of Agricultural Lands and Gardens Act’ was passed due to the importance that land plays in sustaining food security and in order to determine a required procedure for altering how a particular piece of land is employed. Due to problems with the implementation of this law, it was amended in 1385 thus enforcing both a Demolition and a fine upon unauthorized alteration of land use. Article 10, paragraph 2, refers to the "independent" Demolition of a building as one of the duties of the Agricultural Jihad Officials, and has led to various interpretations and judicial opinions. As a result some judiciaries enforced the Demolition of buildings without issuing a clear ruling. This paper aims to identify the nature of this law and explain the effects of the nature of this law on those enforcing it. The descriptive-analytical method is employed to prove this paper’ s hypothesis: the enforcement of Demolition of buildings based on the law passed in 1385 is criminal in nature. This paper establishes that the aforementioned article, has expressed a particular ruling on how to enforce a criminal law. This is because according to Article 484 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the issuance of the executive order is up to the prosecutor, while the execution of the Demolition is up to the Agricultural Jihad Officials. Therefore, the Demolition of a building following the unauthorized alteration of land use is possible only after judicial proceedings and the issuance of a final ruling whereas, Demolition without a final ruling is void of legal justification and is in itself punishable by criminal law.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BAHREHMAND, HAMID, & Ghanbarian, Naser. (2021). Demolition without a Final Ruling, Infringement or Explicit Law. MAJLIS & RAHBORD, 27(104 ), 243-264. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/377174/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BAHREHMAND HAMID, Ghanbarian Naser. Demolition without a Final Ruling, Infringement or Explicit Law. MAJLIS & RAHBORD[Internet]. 2021;27(104 ):243-264. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/377174/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HAMID BAHREHMAND, and Naser Ghanbarian, “Demolition without a Final Ruling, Infringement or Explicit Law,” MAJLIS & RAHBORD, vol. 27, no. 104 , pp. 243–264, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/377174/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button