Prioritizing the Criteria for Performance Evaluation of Top Managers in Cultural Organizations

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Ali Abadi Mehdi; Bagherifard Mohammad Hossein; GOODARZI GHOLAMREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT THOUGHT (MANAGEMENT THOUGHT) Year:2020 | Volume:13 | Issue:2 (26) Page(s): 303-326

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,540

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Prioritizing the Criteria for Performance Evaluation of Top Managers in Cultural Organizations

Author(s)

Ali Abadi Mehdi | Bagherifard Mohammad Hossein | GOODARZI GHOLAMREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Islamic ManagementQ2

Cultural OrganizationQ1

PrioritizationQ2

Performance EvaluationQ2

TOPSISQ2

Abstract

One of the means of evaluating Cultural Organizations, as custodians of the reform of community culture, is the evaluation of the top managers of these organizations. Each evaluation system requires criteria for evaluation, to which a lot of research has been devoted. The multiplicity of these criteria doubles the need for prioritizing them, as the evaluation process is always time-consuming and costly. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to prioritize the criteria for the evaluation of higher education managers of Cultural Organizations. Based on the above, the criteria for evaluating the performance of managers from the viewpoint of Imam Ali (AS) were extracted from previous perspectives and then in the next step, using the TOPSIS and SAW methods, based on 3 criteria: 1-Impact on increasing organizational productivity, 2-Matching with the position of top managers of the organization, and 3-measurability has been prioritized. The results of the research show that the criteria that determine the functional and special characteristics of individuals such as science, empowerment, counseling, etc., have a higher priority in evaluating the top managers of Cultural Organizations than those that reflect the personal characteristics of individuals such as piety, self-esteem and. . . and the main reason for this is that, in the view of experts, the criteria for specialty-orientation, are more capable of measuring the values of the criteria. Therefore, the present research’ s proposal is that important criteria such as piety, commitment and. . . should first be converted to more measurable criteria and then be used in the evaluation process.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Ali Abadi, Mehdi, Bagherifard, Mohammad Hossein, & GOODARZI, GHOLAMREZA. (2020). Prioritizing the Criteria for Performance Evaluation of Top Managers in Cultural Organizations. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT THOUGHT (MANAGEMENT THOUGHT), 13(2 (26) ), 303-326. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/385769/en

Vancouver: Copy

Ali Abadi Mehdi, Bagherifard Mohammad Hossein, GOODARZI GHOLAMREZA. Prioritizing the Criteria for Performance Evaluation of Top Managers in Cultural Organizations. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT THOUGHT (MANAGEMENT THOUGHT)[Internet]. 2020;13(2 (26) ):303-326. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/385769/en

IEEE: Copy

Mehdi Ali Abadi, Mohammad Hossein Bagherifard, and GHOLAMREZA GOODARZI, “Prioritizing the Criteria for Performance Evaluation of Top Managers in Cultural Organizations,” STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT THOUGHT (MANAGEMENT THOUGHT), vol. 13, no. 2 (26) , pp. 303–326, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/385769/en

Related Journal Papers