مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,684
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Recursion from Testimony After the issuing of criminal judgment from the Perspective Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian law

Pages

  35-66

Abstract

 The Islamic Penal Code in the Article 198 provides that If the Recursion is made before the performance of punishments, it is resulted in its unreliability; Although the legislator has been silent about the responsibility of the witness who withdraws his evidence. However, not only the majority of jurists but also the dominant Fatwā from the Perspective of the legislator says that except of Hudud, the Recursion After the verdict do not cause its annulment. The issue of the validity of the Testimony that in criminal proceedings after the issuing of judgment, the witness withdraws his evidence is the subject of the present study. In addition The responsibility of the witness withdraws his evidence is also discussed. study of Jurisprudential Documents shows that the Recursion After the issuing of judgment, Even if it is carried out after the execution of the punishment, Both in cases involving prescribed / discretionary punishments and Retaliation / Penal Compensation, do cause the annulment of the verdict which is based on Testimony and thus if condemnation connected with property and the object like Penal Compensation remains as the same, it will be returned to the convicted person, and when restitution is not possible, as well as other injuries both physical and non-physical, The witness is responsible. In proportion to the role that the witness has in proving the Evidence, based to jurisprudential sources The manner of distribution of responsibility has also been specified in different situations.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Akrami, Rouhollah. (2021). The Recursion from Testimony After the issuing of criminal judgment from the Perspective Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian law. ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE STUDIES, 12(23 ), 35-66. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/386069/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Akrami Rouhollah. The Recursion from Testimony After the issuing of criminal judgment from the Perspective Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian law. ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE STUDIES[Internet]. 2021;12(23 ):35-66. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/386069/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Rouhollah Akrami, “The Recursion from Testimony After the issuing of criminal judgment from the Perspective Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian law,” ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE STUDIES, vol. 12, no. 23 , pp. 35–66, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/386069/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button