Conflicting Decisions in International Investment Arbitration: Typology, Origins and Solutions

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Eftekhar Jahromi Goodarz; Narimani Zaman Abadi Mohammad Reza

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW Year:2021 | Volume:- | Issue:64 Page(s): 7-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

276

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Conflicting Decisions in International Investment Arbitration: Typology, Origins and Solutions

Author(s)

Eftekhar Jahromi Goodarz | Narimani Zaman Abadi Mohammad Reza | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Conflicting DecisionsQ1

International Investment ArbitrationQ1

Shareholders’ClaimsQ1

Doctrine of NecessityQ1

Fork-in-the-Road ClauseQ1

Consolidation of ProceedingsQ1

Abstract

Arbitration has in recent times been considered as the most useful mechanism for settling international investment disputes. The significant increase in referring to arbitration, according to many commentators, must be sought in arbitration’ s comparative advantages in terms of predictability and the trust of its international users. Conflicting Decisions are among important setbacks to these advantages, and in particular, the issue of predictability in arbitration. Through an in-depth analysis of relevant arbitral precedent, this paper seeks to suggest a typology of Conflicting Decisions, and to explain potential solutions available for addressing its causes. It is concluded that, first, a degree of inconsistency is an integral part of any dispute settlement system, and therefore, it may not be fully eliminated from arbitration. Second, each type of conflict requires a unique solution, and accordingly, there is no single mechanism to address all types of Conflicting Decisions. Finally, inconsistency might not be eliminated unless a number of revisions are made to international treaties relevant to investment arbitration.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Eftekhar Jahromi, Goodarz, & Narimani Zaman Abadi, Mohammad Reza. (2021). Conflicting Decisions in International Investment Arbitration: Typology, Origins and Solutions. INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, -(64 ), 7-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/390617/en

Vancouver: Copy

Eftekhar Jahromi Goodarz, Narimani Zaman Abadi Mohammad Reza. Conflicting Decisions in International Investment Arbitration: Typology, Origins and Solutions. INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW[Internet]. 2021;-(64 ):7-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/390617/en

IEEE: Copy

Goodarz Eftekhar Jahromi, and Mohammad Reza Narimani Zaman Abadi, “Conflicting Decisions in International Investment Arbitration: Typology, Origins and Solutions,” INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, vol. -, no. 64 , pp. 7–34, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/390617/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops