A Research to Resolve the Apparent Conflict between the La Haraj Rule and the Harsh Acts of Islam; Answers and analyzes

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Alavi Gonabadi Sayyed Jafar; Ali Akbar Habibi Mehr

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Fiqh va Usul Year:2020 | Volume:52 | Issue:3 (122) Page(s): 73-91

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

278

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Research to Resolve the Apparent Conflict between the La Haraj Rule and the Harsh Acts of Islam; Answers and analyzes

Author(s)

Alavi Gonabadi Sayyed Jafar | Ali Akbar Habibi Mehr | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HardshipQ1

Negation of HarajQ1

La Haraj RuleQ2

Conflict with Harsh RulesQ1

Abstract

The rule of negation of Hardship is one of the most efficient and important jurisprudential rules in terms of application in various fields of jurisprudence. The generality of this rule seems to be incompatible with the troublesome and harsh rulings that exist in religion. Therefore, the present article seeks to answer the question of how one can both accept the proofs of the harsh rulings and commit oneself to rejecting the harsh rulings in religion. The results of this article which has been prepared through a descriptive-analytical and library method show that out of the total number of answers to this doubt, four approaches can be presented: rejecting the existence of harsh rulings in the religion (minor premise problem), not accepting the generality of the rule without restriction (major premise problem), modifying the meaning of Haraj (constriction) and not addressing the doubt itself. Among all answers, the doctrine of “ restriction of the negation of constriction rule” is a suitable and perfect answer. Other answers are either essentially defective or require complementary evidence and therefore cannot be accepted as an independent answer.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Alavi Gonabadi, Sayyed Jafar, & , Ali Akbar Habibi Mehr. (2020). A Research to Resolve the Apparent Conflict between the La Haraj Rule and the Harsh Acts of Islam; Answers and analyzes. QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES, 52(3 (122) ), 73-91. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/390684/en

Vancouver: Copy

Alavi Gonabadi Sayyed Jafar, Ali Akbar Habibi Mehr. A Research to Resolve the Apparent Conflict between the La Haraj Rule and the Harsh Acts of Islam; Answers and analyzes. QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;52(3 (122) ):73-91. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/390684/en

IEEE: Copy

Sayyed Jafar Alavi Gonabadi, and Ali Akbar Habibi Mehr, “A Research to Resolve the Apparent Conflict between the La Haraj Rule and the Harsh Acts of Islam; Answers and analyzes,” QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES, vol. 52, no. 3 (122) , pp. 73–91, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/390684/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops