REAPPRAISING THE THEORY OF IMPOSING CONDITION FOR NUMEROUS CONFESSIONS IN PROVING ADULTERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHSENI DEHKALANI M.; ALI MORADI A.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES Year:2008 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 75-96

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,113

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REAPPRAISING THE THEORY OF IMPOSING CONDITION FOR NUMEROUS CONFESSIONS IN PROVING ADULTERY

Author(s)

MOHSENI DEHKALANI M. | ALI MORADI A.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ADULTERYQ3

AFFIRMATIVE EVIDENCESQ3

IMPOSING CONDITION (Q4

SANS-SERIF">ISHTIRA-T) OF NUMEROUS CONFESSIONSQ3

RARE VERDICTQ3

Abstract

ADULTERY is proved only through numerous and frequent confessions (four times) and confession to less than that would not invoke legal punishment (ḥadd). This view is widely accepted by the Imāmī jurists. Among them, however, is Ibn ‘Aqīl ‘Ammānī who stands against the widely accepted view and believes that such crimes are provable by means of a single confession.By reappraising this issue and analyzing and evaluating the evidences of both views, the writer takes on a third theory. In brief, the writer believes that a single confession would suffice for proving the ADULTERY provided that it meets all the conditions of effectiveness. Only the ADULTERY leading to stoning (rajm), in terms of the narrations existing in this regard, requires four independent confessions in order to be proved. Besides enjoying a specific reason, the bulk of this theory is consistent with the generalities of the evidences like the overall rule "the confession of the wise on themselves is admissible", and the latter instance corresponds more with the "principle of precaution in bloodshed".

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHSENI DEHKALANI, M., & ALI MORADI, A.A.. (2009). REAPPRAISING THE THEORY OF IMPOSING CONDITION FOR NUMEROUS CONFESSIONS IN PROVING ADULTERY. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES, -(81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES)), 75-96. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/391461/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHSENI DEHKALANI M., ALI MORADI A.A.. REAPPRAISING THE THEORY OF IMPOSING CONDITION FOR NUMEROUS CONFESSIONS IN PROVING ADULTERY. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES[Internet]. 2009;-(81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES)):75-96. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/391461/en

IEEE: Copy

M. MOHSENI DEHKALANI, and A.A. ALI MORADI, “REAPPRAISING THE THEORY OF IMPOSING CONDITION FOR NUMEROUS CONFESSIONS IN PROVING ADULTERY,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES, vol. -, no. 81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES), pp. 75–96, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/391461/en

Related Journal Papers