A Comparative Study of Refusal to Accept Rights in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Principles of European Contract Law

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOUSAVI SEYED MAHDI; SADEGHI NESHAT AMIR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES Year:2020 | Volume:12 | Issue:21 Page(s): 191-220

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

291

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Refusal to Accept Rights in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Principles of European Contract Law

Author(s)

MOUSAVI SEYED MAHDI | SADEGHI NESHAT AMIR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RefusalQ1

Right AcceptanceQ1

Handing Over or Maintaining of Refused PropertyQ1

Self-Help SalesQ1

Abstract

The Refusal of the acceptance a right occurs when one party or a third party in a contractual or non-contractual relationship wants to surrender the right to the other party but the other party refuses to accept it except in legal cases, so legislators to protect the other party, that confronted with the Refusal of the other party, offering solutions to compensate for his/her losses (damages). In this study, we consider the solutions presented against the Refusal to accept the right in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, the Iranian legal system and the principles of European contract law, and by explaining these issues, the similarities and differences of the solutions presented in these three legal systems are studied. The examination of the rules provided for in these three legal systems shows that Imamiyyah jurisprudence and the principles of European contract law tend to apply to Self-Help Sales (non-judicial) institutions, but in the Iranian legal system, reference to the judiciary is accepted as a principle.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOUSAVI, SEYED MAHDI, & SADEGHI NESHAT, AMIR. (2020). A Comparative Study of Refusal to Accept Rights in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Principles of European Contract Law. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, 12(21 ), 191-220. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/391731/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOUSAVI SEYED MAHDI, SADEGHI NESHAT AMIR. A Comparative Study of Refusal to Accept Rights in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Principles of European Contract Law. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2020;12(21 ):191-220. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/391731/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MAHDI MOUSAVI, and AMIR SADEGHI NESHAT, “A Comparative Study of Refusal to Accept Rights in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Principles of European Contract Law,” CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, vol. 12, no. 21 , pp. 191–220, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/391731/en

Related Journal Papers