A Critique on the Book “ Spheres of Justice: A Defense If Pluralism and Equality

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shojaeian Mohammad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES Year:2021 | Volume:21 | Issue:6 Page(s): 195-212

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

619

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critique on the Book “ Spheres of Justice: A Defense If Pluralism and Equality

Author(s)

Shojaeian Mohammad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JusticeQ2

Distributive JusticeQ2

SocialismQ1

EqualityQ2

WalzerQ1

Abstract

In “ Spheres of Justice, ” Walzer offers an explanation of the principles of distributive Justice based on an understanding of the meanings of the various social good. This explanation of Justice is “ pluralistic” and based on the idea of “ complex Equality. ” Walzer’ s point is that each area of social life has its own criteria for distributing social good, and one area should not be extended to other areas. The opposite of Walzer’ s ideal Justice is coercion and domination, which means the domination of the standard of Justice in one area over other areas of social life. The diversity of the principles of the distribution of social good, the attempt to reconcile pluralism and Equality, and the opposition to the domination of capital over the realm of political power are among the highlights of Walzer” s theory of Justice. Walzer’ s critics, on the other hand, argue that Walzer’ s conservative nature makes him unable to take a clear critical stance on the wrong ways of distributing social good. Lack of a clear criterion for understanding the social criteria of the distribution of goods, the relativity of social meanings, and inability to provide a criterion for criticizing incorrect methods in the distribution of social good are among the most important criticisms of Walzer’ s theory of Justice.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shojaeian, Mohammad. (2021). A Critique on the Book “ Spheres of Justice: A Defense If Pluralism and Equality. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 21(6 ), 195-212. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/393343/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shojaeian Mohammad. A Critique on the Book “ Spheres of Justice: A Defense If Pluralism and Equality. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2021;21(6 ):195-212. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/393343/en

IEEE: Copy

Mohammad Shojaeian, “A Critique on the Book “ Spheres of Justice: A Defense If Pluralism and Equality,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 21, no. 6 , pp. 195–212, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/393343/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops