Prioritizing the common urban excavation supporting systems using AHP method: A step to crisis management in urban constructions

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Zandie Keivan; Taherkhani Roohollah; ZIAIE MOAYED REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Year:2019 | Volume:7 | Issue:14 Page(s): 81-91

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

302

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Prioritizing the common urban excavation supporting systems using AHP method: A step to crisis management in urban constructions

Author(s)

Zandie Keivan | Taherkhani Roohollah | ZIAIE MOAYED REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Common urban excavationsQ1

Excavation supporting systemsQ1

Prioritization by expertsQ1

AHP methodQ2

Excavation accidents crisis managementQ1

Abstract

In urban areas, the number of deep excavations has been increasing due to the rising population and land cost. Hence, the application of different supporting systems for the excavations has become a common issue to engineers. Considering the critical accidents statistics in excavation works, this article has focused on prioritizing the most common supporting systems in the urban areas, using the AHP method. In the first step, by interviewing the experts on this issue, six common supporting systems and six criterions for prioritization of them were identified. Then, by designing a questionnaire, the pairwise comparison of the alternatives and criterions has been conducted. According to the expert's opinions, each of the supporting systems received different priorities in each of the six criterions. Finally, after the analysis of the questionnaires using EXPERT CHOICE, the final priorities of the supporting systems were presented. Accounting all the priorities in different criterions, “ Soil Nailing” was recognized as the most appreciable method for supporting the excavation in shallow-to-medium excavation pits. In the final step, the article analysis results were evaluated compared with the real process of choosing the supporting systems in practical excavations.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Zandie, Keivan, Taherkhani, Roohollah, & ZIAIE MOAYED, REZA. (2019). Prioritizing the common urban excavation supporting systems using AHP method: A step to crisis management in urban constructions. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 7(14 ), 81-91. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/394585/en

Vancouver: Copy

Zandie Keivan, Taherkhani Roohollah, ZIAIE MOAYED REZA. Prioritizing the common urban excavation supporting systems using AHP method: A step to crisis management in urban constructions. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2019;7(14 ):81-91. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/394585/en

IEEE: Copy

Keivan Zandie, Roohollah Taherkhani, and REZA ZIAIE MOAYED, “Prioritizing the common urban excavation supporting systems using AHP method: A step to crisis management in urban constructions,” EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, vol. 7, no. 14 , pp. 81–91, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/394585/en

Related Journal Papers