Structural and Functional Analysis of Unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems; Justificatory Grounds and Critical study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Garousi Hassan; Baseri Babak

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW KNOWLEDGE Year:2020 | Volume:8 | Issue:26 Page(s): 47-68

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

910

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Structural and Functional Analysis of Unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems; Justificatory Grounds and Critical study

Author(s)

Garousi Hassan | Baseri Babak | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Bicameral Legislative System

Unicameral Legislative System

Referendum

Parliament

Check and Balance

Abstract

The Bicameral Legislative Systems are the historical product of class societies, especially feudal systems in the 17th and 18th centuries. Other countries also created bicameral systems, influenced by the book of the Spirit of Law, the classical work of Charles de Montesquieu, who saw the British Parliamentary system as the origin of progress, development and democracy. The legislative experience of some countries, such as Denmark, Iceland and the State of Nebraska, has led to changes in the structure of the legislature and the conversion of the bicameral Parliament to a unicameral system. In this descriptive-analytic study, we compare unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems. These systems have been examined by standards of law stability, legislative responsibility, legislative authority, decision-making quality, efficiency and economic viability. The greatest benefits of dual-Parliamentary systems are legislative oversight and balance, pluralism and minority participation in the legislature. Nevertheless, the economics and legal efficiency of unicameral systems along with accelerating the decision-making process have led to change of some bicameral systems to unicameral ones.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Garousi, Hassan, & Baseri, Babak. (2020). Structural and Functional Analysis of Unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems; Justificatory Grounds and Critical study. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW KNOWLEDGE, 8(26 ), 47-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/398409/en

Vancouver: Copy

Garousi Hassan, Baseri Babak. Structural and Functional Analysis of Unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems; Justificatory Grounds and Critical study. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW KNOWLEDGE[Internet]. 2020;8(26 ):47-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/398409/en

IEEE: Copy

Hassan Garousi, and Babak Baseri, “Structural and Functional Analysis of Unicameral and Bicameral Legislative Systems; Justificatory Grounds and Critical study,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW KNOWLEDGE, vol. 8, no. 26 , pp. 47–68, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/398409/en

Related Journal Papers