The Comparative Evaluation of the Spatial Planning System of Iran in Comparison With Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Malaysia

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIRGHOLAMI MORTEZA; POURJAFAR MOHAMMADREZA; MISAGHI SEYED MAHMOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Spatial Planning Year:2019 | Volume:23 | Issue:3 Page(s): 1-41

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

854

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Comparative Evaluation of the Spatial Planning System of Iran in Comparison With Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Malaysia

Author(s)

MIRGHOLAMI MORTEZA | POURJAFAR MOHAMMADREZA | MISAGHI SEYED MAHMOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Comparative EvaluationQ1

Planning SystemQ3

Spatial PlanningQ2

Developing CountriesQ2

IranQ2

Abstract

Introduction "Understanding and evaluating of spatial Planning System" without recognizing of "planning and development system" of countries and without the Understanding of similar situations and lessons learned from others' experiences are not achieved to goals. In This paper isn’ t "deliberately" used the experiences of advanced and developed industrial countries, and focus on "Developing Countries. " Because based on realistic approaches to development, the experiences of similar countries provide more appropriate territorial development strategies to the decision takers. Therefore, four countries (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Malaysia) have been selected for this assessment and analogy because based on social, economic, political and. . . characteristics, there is a greater relative and homogeneous relationship between the Islamic Republic of Iran and these countries, which is the main reason for this choice and comparison Methodology. In this analogy, two types of cognition include: basic knowledge (general and geographical status, economic and internal divisions), and special recognition (macro Planning System and spatial Planning System) were obtained from four countries and analogy with Iran. The method of research was descriptive-analytic and based on documentary and library studies that was completed by comparative analogy. First, the experienced international components were identified in the Comparative Evaluation knowledge and then based on the conditions of Iran and four Muslim countries The other seven and four components in the "content" and "procedural" dimensions for the concepts of "planning" and "Spatial Planning" were formulated and a comparative analogy was made for the situation in the five countries. Results and discussion according to the findings in the theoretical field (documentary-content), the macro-Planning System of most of the studied countries is similar and in line with the more advanced industrial countries with some weaknesses, but in the field of action (process-outcome) the existing differences are very tangible. The situation in the urban planning of these countries has been weaker than their large-scale planning. In Spatial Planning at urban and metropolitan levels for planning and optimized spatial management, most often pursue the goal of sustainable development in varying degrees, and it is a way of responding to their challenges, but because of government features, lack of practical motivation and the lack of evaluation, monitoring and lack of cultural contexts in achieving the goals, they have a lot of obvious weaknesses. Conclusion The final findings showed that in the "macro Planning System", all countries have a continuous planning horizon with distinct periods, a dominant economic approach, low participation, and a strong, but not executive, discursive chastiality. Iran, in terms of a theoretical approach similar to Saudi Arabia, Similar participation of Egypt and Saudi Arabia in the actors of development similar to Egypt and almost Turkey, and in other components, is the same as that of any other country. In the "Spatial Planning System", Iran has been involved in the components of the hierarchical levels of planning

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MIRGHOLAMI, MORTEZA, POURJAFAR, MOHAMMADREZA, & MISAGHI, SEYED MAHMOUD. (2019). The Comparative Evaluation of the Spatial Planning System of Iran in Comparison With Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Malaysia. SPATIAL PLANNING (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), 23(3 ), 1-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/398974/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIRGHOLAMI MORTEZA, POURJAFAR MOHAMMADREZA, MISAGHI SEYED MAHMOUD. The Comparative Evaluation of the Spatial Planning System of Iran in Comparison With Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Malaysia. SPATIAL PLANNING (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2019;23(3 ):1-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/398974/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA MIRGHOLAMI, MOHAMMADREZA POURJAFAR, and SEYED MAHMOUD MISAGHI, “The Comparative Evaluation of the Spatial Planning System of Iran in Comparison With Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Malaysia,” SPATIAL PLANNING (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), vol. 23, no. 3 , pp. 1–41, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/398974/en

Related Journal Papers