The Status of the “ What is contrary to them involves rectitude” Element in Traditions Concerning Treatment of Contradictory Proofs and its Evaluation in Respect of Testimony and Judgment by non-Shiites

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Molavi Vardanjani Saeed

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Fiqh va Usul Year:2021 | Volume:52 | Issue:4 (123) Page(s): 143-163

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

200

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Status of the “ What is contrary to them involves rectitude” Element in Traditions Concerning Treatment of Contradictory Proofs and its Evaluation in Respect of Testimony and Judgment by non-Shiites

Author(s)

Molavi Vardanjani Saeed | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Contradiction of ProofsQ1

RectitudeQ2

Being Contrary to SunnisQ1

TestimonyQ2

JudgmentQ1

Abstract

In treating the contradiction of narrations, narration opposing Sunnis takes precedence over narrations consistent with them; since it has been said that what is contrary to them involves Rectitude. As far as the contradiction of narrations is concerned, this criterion has been taken for granted with respect to all Sunnis and in addition it is not specific to Shiites, for Sunnis reciprocally prefer the narration inconsistent with Shiite. However, there is disagreement about the generality of the criterion as well as its applicability to other areas including Testimony and Judgment and the present paper, in order to study this issue, has discussed it through a descriptive-analytical method and achieved the conclusion that the above mentioned argument is limited to resolving the Contradiction of Proofs and has no more more capability; consequently, relying on it to prove the condition of belief (being Shiite) for judge and witness is not defendable.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Molavi Vardanjani, Saeed. (2021). The Status of the “ What is contrary to them involves rectitude” Element in Traditions Concerning Treatment of Contradictory Proofs and its Evaluation in Respect of Testimony and Judgment by non-Shiites. QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES, 52(4 (123) ), 143-163. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/401282/en

Vancouver: Copy

Molavi Vardanjani Saeed. The Status of the “ What is contrary to them involves rectitude” Element in Traditions Concerning Treatment of Contradictory Proofs and its Evaluation in Respect of Testimony and Judgment by non-Shiites. QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES[Internet]. 2021;52(4 (123) ):143-163. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/401282/en

IEEE: Copy

Saeed Molavi Vardanjani, “The Status of the “ What is contrary to them involves rectitude” Element in Traditions Concerning Treatment of Contradictory Proofs and its Evaluation in Respect of Testimony and Judgment by non-Shiites,” QURANIC & HADITH STUDIES, vol. 52, no. 4 (123) , pp. 143–163, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/401282/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops