مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

295
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Western Political Thought on the Scales of Thought A Critical of the Book Modern Western Political Thought: The Dialectic of Ideas

Pages

  113-134

Abstract

 In her Book, Modern Western Political Thought, Alireza Ismailzad has written a relatively comprehensive look at the developments in political thought in the West from the seventeenth Century to the postmodern situation. The main premise in the critique of this book is based on the necessity of producing such works. Because of the existence of a large number of books in the field of Western Political Thought, including authorship and translation, the importance of innovation in the production of new works is doubled. Does this mean that there is basically a new need for rethinking in this area? And, does this book open a new window on Western Political Thought? Regardless of its strengths, the book has objections to chronological, thematic, thematic classification, how modern political thought was formed and evolved in the West, the choice of political thinkers, and the methodology of analyzing and interpreting the findings. For example, ignoring the theoretical foundations of the emergence of modern political thought such as the renaissance, not mentioning the theories of thinkers such as Luther, Machiavelli, and Hobbes, lack of sociological approach, and most importantly, the exclusion of the basic foundations of modern political thought, including politics, government, sovereignty, identity, nationality, etc. are the most prominent shortcomings of the book.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ZIVYAR, FARHAD, Rezaee Hosseinabadi, Mustafa, & Etemadi Bozorg, amir. (2020). Western Political Thought on the Scales of Thought A Critical of the Book Modern Western Political Thought: The Dialectic of Ideas. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 20(9 ), 113-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/401561/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ZIVYAR FARHAD, Rezaee Hosseinabadi Mustafa, Etemadi Bozorg amir. Western Political Thought on the Scales of Thought A Critical of the Book Modern Western Political Thought: The Dialectic of Ideas. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2020;20(9 ):113-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/401561/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FARHAD ZIVYAR, Mustafa Rezaee Hosseinabadi, and amir Etemadi Bozorg, “Western Political Thought on the Scales of Thought A Critical of the Book Modern Western Political Thought: The Dialectic of Ideas,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 20, no. 9 , pp. 113–134, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/401561/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button