Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins' Fundamentally Definitional Deficiencies in Philosophical Theology

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Zamanian Moslem; KHOSROPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2020 | Volume:15 | Issue:59 Page(s): 7-20

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

341

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins' Fundamentally Definitional Deficiencies in Philosophical Theology

Author(s)

Zamanian Moslem | KHOSROPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Steven HawkingQ1

Richard DawkinsQ2

Definitional FoundationsQ1

Philosophical TheologyQ2

Principles of AtheismQ1

Abstract

Abstract: Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins are contemporary theologians who have come up with empirical approaches in the field of theology, one in the field of physics and the other in the field of biology. The most important factor that has led to such a conclusion in the scientific approach of these two scholars is their wrong definitions of subject and philosophical conceptions. The current research has critiqued their views by extracting their definitional elements from their works with a library-based approach. Their Misconceptions of philosophy and its realm, as well as their misconceptions of philosophical concepts such as misunderstanding the immaterial, the necessary Being and Its Attributes, the criterion for the need to necessary Being, and the principle of causality, time, and nothingness may be cited as some examples of these deficiencies.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Zamanian, Moslem, & KHOSROPANAH, ABDOLHOSSEIN. (2020). Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins' Fundamentally Definitional Deficiencies in Philosophical Theology. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 15(59 ), 7-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/403661/en

Vancouver: Copy

Zamanian Moslem, KHOSROPANAH ABDOLHOSSEIN. Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins' Fundamentally Definitional Deficiencies in Philosophical Theology. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2020;15(59 ):7-20. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/403661/en

IEEE: Copy

Moslem Zamanian, and ABDOLHOSSEIN KHOSROPANAH, “Steven Hawking and Richard Dawkins' Fundamentally Definitional Deficiencies in Philosophical Theology,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 15, no. 59 , pp. 7–20, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/403661/en

Related Journal Papers