مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,536
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Validation of Generalizing the Kafir’ s Testimony against Muslim in Civil Cases

Pages

  203-228

Keywords

Nafi-e-Sabil (The principle of negation of ascendency of non-Muslims over Muslims)Q1

Abstract

testimony is one of the evidences for proving a case to court which has been accepted by all legal systems. Testifying is sometimes between Muslims against each others, Muslims against unbelievers, unbelievers against Muslims and unbelievers against unbelievers. According to the Islamic jurisprudential proofs, Muslim’ s testimony in relation to unbelievers is accepted but unbeliever’ s testimony in relation to Muslims is unaccepted in the civil cases based on the Quranic and hadith proofs and evidences. Therefore, in Imamiyah fiqh, it is rejected the generality of unbeliever’ s testimony in legal matters against or on behalf of Muslims and according to the evidences it is not valid. But unbeliever’ s testimony in relation to Muslim in the case of Wills (testaments) is proved by the Quranic and hadith proofs. Islamic jurists with adducing to the mentioned proofs have only accepted unbeliever’ s testimony in MuslimsWills. But adducing the generality of some of the Quran verses is vitiated and also the universality of which has been expressed by some hadiths the study concludes that unbelievers with conditions not only in Wills but also in some other cases can testify. Therefore, in this note with studying and criticizing the proofs of non-acceptance of unbeliever’ s testimony in cases other than Wills and the proofs of permissibility of the acceptance of dhimmī s’ testimony (Arabic: ذمی literally: protected people) in the issue of Wills, it has examined and analyzed the possibility of generalizing unbelievers testimony to cases other than Will and at the end with using the reason resulted from Islamic traditions, the definite (certain) tanqih al-manat (to extract the absolute or certain reason of hukm and extend to the similar cases) and a fortiori analog-qiyā s-(Arabic: قیاس اولویت ) with analytic-inferring method, it has been reasoned the possibility of generality out.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Alishahi Qaleh Juqi, Abolfazl, Gharib Pour, Mansoor, & Muhammadi, Farkhondeh. (2021). The Validation of Generalizing the Kafir’ s Testimony against Muslim in Civil Cases. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, 13(23 ), 203-228. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/403684/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Alishahi Qaleh Juqi Abolfazl, Gharib Pour Mansoor, Muhammadi Farkhondeh. The Validation of Generalizing the Kafir’ s Testimony against Muslim in Civil Cases. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2021;13(23 ):203-228. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/403684/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Abolfazl Alishahi Qaleh Juqi, Mansoor Gharib Pour, and Farkhondeh Muhammadi, “The Validation of Generalizing the Kafir’ s Testimony against Muslim in Civil Cases,” CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, vol. 13, no. 23 , pp. 203–228, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/403684/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top