A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MALEKI ALIREZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Existence and Knowledge Year:2019 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 (10) Page(s): 25-41

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

389

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference

Author(s)

MALEKI ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KripkeQ1

SenseQ2

reference theoryQ1

namingQ2

necessityQ2

FregeQ2

Abstract

In Gottlub Frege's theory of the meaning of particular names and his descriptions of the meaning-making process of that, and subsequently, the process of conformation and fixing the references through the proposed meaning, Kripke introduces criticism. By misrepresenting the dual processes of Frege's theory, and consequently Russell's, Kripke argues that this theory is ineffective and misleading. My main purpose is to discuss Kripke's most important description of the theory, which is reflected in "naming and necessity" and to challenge Kripke's critique. Accordingly, I believed that Kripke's criticism of Frege for the confusion between the two processes of fixing and meaning-making in a Sense in the theory is incorrect, and Kripke created this view and mistakenly attributes this idea to Frege at first. Actually, Kripke made this idea for Frege and from his theories in Sence and Reference. But Frege never mentioned this misleading in the process of fixing the Sense for the references. Kripke after this creation began to critique on Frege in this. For this conclusion, we first need to explain Frege's theory of meaning and then we will research in terms of two processes of references and meaning fixation. This article claims that the two cannot be traced in the Frege's views, and Kripke has not used sufficient precision, deliberately or inadvertently, in his description of this theory.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MALEKI, ALIREZA. (2019). A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference. JOURNAL OF EXISTENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, 5(2 (10) ), 25-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/404546/en

Vancouver: Copy

MALEKI ALIREZA. A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference. JOURNAL OF EXISTENCE AND KNOWLEDGE[Internet]. 2019;5(2 (10) ):25-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/404546/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA MALEKI, “A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference,” JOURNAL OF EXISTENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, vol. 5, no. 2 (10) , pp. 25–41, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/404546/en

Related Journal Papers