A Comparative Analysis of the Difference between Recitations with Reference to Ijtihad or Sunnat

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Yusufi Muqaddam Muhammad Sadiq

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES Year:2020 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 (10) Page(s): 107-126

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

387

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Analysis of the Difference between Recitations with Reference to Ijtihad or Sunnat

Author(s)

Yusufi Muqaddam Muhammad Sadiq | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Qira’at (Recitation)

Tawator (Successive)

Khabar-e Vahed (Not Clearly Traceable to the Prophet)

Sunnat (Tradition of the Prophet)

Ijtihad (Independent Reasoning)

Ikhtiar (Free Will)

Abstract

The subject of this study is to survey two citation theories on the difference between Qur’ anic recitations with reference to Ijtihad (independent reasoning) by the reader (Qari) or Sunnat-e Nabawi (the prophetic tradition). In this regard, first a brief review of variants in the recitation of the Qur’ an as well as citation to Ijtihad or Sunnat as the source of discrepancy were mentioned. Then, the reasons of the two above viewpoints were critically analyzed, and it was proved that the scholars of Qira’ at do not acknowledge the readings not approved by Sunnat. The results also showed that those experts who claim citation to Ijtihad in Qira’ at have confused independent reasoning with logical free will in the recitation. Moreover, some companions of the Prophet (Sahabeh) have resisted against Ijtihad of some others in reading the Qur’ an. The difference between the reading of the Qur’ an was also critically analyzed from the perspective of citation to the tradition of Prophet in terms of “ sunnat-e Mutawatir” (successive recognized and reliable sources) and “ Ahad” (Not clearly traceable to Prophet Muhammad); and the results showed that the recitations are not Mutawatir and validated. Even the assumption of successively reliable recitations after the Prophet does not have an effect on the accuracy of the content of Qira’ at. Since it is assumed that all recitations are not accurate, in case of having discrepancies we should refer to a more transparent (Azhar) one, and if not possible, those readings would be aborted and we should make a reference to another argument.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Yusufi Muqaddam, Muhammad Sadiq. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of the Difference between Recitations with Reference to Ijtihad or Sunnat. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 5(2 (10) ), 107-126. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/406232/en

Vancouver: Copy

Yusufi Muqaddam Muhammad Sadiq. A Comparative Analysis of the Difference between Recitations with Reference to Ijtihad or Sunnat. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;5(2 (10) ):107-126. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/406232/en

IEEE: Copy

Muhammad Sadiq Yusufi Muqaddam, “A Comparative Analysis of the Difference between Recitations with Reference to Ijtihad or Sunnat,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 5, no. 2 (10) , pp. 107–126, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/406232/en

Related Journal Papers