مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

416
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Complete (Perfect) and Incomplete (Partial) Cause in Philosophy with Motive (Reason) and Condition in the Knowledge of the Principles of Jurisprudence

Pages

  231-250

Keywords

Motive (reason) in Philosophy and PrinciplesQ1
Complete (perfect) and incomplete (partial) cause in the knowledge of principlesQ1

Abstract

 Causality, which is one of the principles of existence and thought, is one of the important issues in the field of religious knowledge (studies). Shiite thinkers, as a rationalist current, have always defended the principle of causality and explained its rulings and types. Division of cause into complete (perfect), incomplete (partial), real, preparing, simple, compound (composite), proximate, remote, etc. in philosophy and division into cause, condition, appropriateness (necessary), hindrance (hindering) and preparer, etc. in the knowledge of principles of jurisprudence, is one of the common topics between these two studies. Philosophers have done this division mostly by the method of dichotomy exclusion, and the scholars of the knowledge of principles have presented multiple divisions according to the jurisprudential and practical credentials. In this article, we have comparatively studied the Divisions of cause in these two sciences by an analytical method, and by criticizing of the explanation principally, we have shown that the division of causes in the dichotomy method is more coherent and convincing and faces fewer problems. In addition, some divisions of motive (reason) in the knowledge of principles can be interpreted based on the common division in philosophy.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOGHADAM, GHOLAM ALI. (2020). A Comparative Study of Complete (Perfect) and Incomplete (Partial) Cause in Philosophy with Motive (Reason) and Condition in the Knowledge of the Principles of Jurisprudence. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, 15(26 ), 231-250. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/408591/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOGHADAM GHOLAM ALI. A Comparative Study of Complete (Perfect) and Incomplete (Partial) Cause in Philosophy with Motive (Reason) and Condition in the Knowledge of the Principles of Jurisprudence. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2020;15(26 ):231-250. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/408591/en

    IEEE: Copy

    GHOLAM ALI MOGHADAM, “A Comparative Study of Complete (Perfect) and Incomplete (Partial) Cause in Philosophy with Motive (Reason) and Condition in the Knowledge of the Principles of Jurisprudence,” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, vol. 15, no. 26 , pp. 231–250, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/408591/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button