مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

216
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Critique and Assessment of the Arguments for Denying the Quidity of the Necessary Being

Pages

  35-58

Abstract

 In this article, we review the main reasons of Muslim philosophers for denying the nature of the Necessary being. First, by separating the three meanings of nature and three different interpretations of the originality of Existence, We try to get a clear picture of the conflict. Then we mention the most important arguments for denying the nature of the Necessary being And we show that most of these arguments were either based on the originality of nature or are based on a particular understanding of the originality of Existence that is debatable. Finally, we show that according to the correct interpretation of the originality of Existence The nature is determination of Existence, and Existence without determination has no meaning. Therefore, every being has a nature; Both limited and unlimited. However, because the Necessary being is unlimited, its nature, which which exists with the same Existence, will be unlimited. Accordingly, there was no conclusive reason for denying the nature of the Necessary being, but There is argument that Necessary being has nature. Necessary and Possible beings have nature in the same meaning. However, the referencce of nature is different in them.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Naqavi, Reza, & Fayyazi, Gholamreza. (2021). Critique and Assessment of the Arguments for Denying the Quidity of the Necessary Being. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2(3 ), 35-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/410507/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Naqavi Reza, Fayyazi Gholamreza. Critique and Assessment of the Arguments for Denying the Quidity of the Necessary Being. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2021;2(3 ):35-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/410507/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Reza Naqavi, and Gholamreza Fayyazi, “Critique and Assessment of the Arguments for Denying the Quidity of the Necessary Being,” METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 2, no. 3 , pp. 35–58, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/410507/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button