Critical Analysis of the Essential Interpretation of Substantive Motion; Comparing the Views of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NOJABA NAFISEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Metaphysical Investigations Year:2021 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 161-177

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

208

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Critical Analysis of the Essential Interpretation of Substantive Motion; Comparing the Views of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra

Author(s)

NOJABA NAFISEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Unlike Avicenna, who considered motion as a subsequents of the natural body and accepted its existence in only four accidental categories, Mulla Sadra considered motion in the essence and essence of objects and transferred the discussion about it from natural sciences to theology. But this theory has been exposed to two different interpretations in his metaphysics. Essential interpretation in which the concepts of peripatetic metaphysics such as matter and form are used and existential interpretation which is presented based on the fundamentality of existence and the use of concepts such as flowing existence. Regardless of the criticisms that may be leveled at the second interpretation, this article focuses on the essential interpretation. An attempt has been made by analyzing Avicenna's arguments to Check out his presuppositions on these reasons. It is then shown that presenting any view of Avicenna's attitude requires a fundamental change in his presuppositions in accepting immobility in substance. Therefore, any explanation that seeks to be presented on the basis of the previous principles will not be satisfactory, as Mulla Sadra has failed to present it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NOJABA, NAFISEH. (2021). Critical Analysis of the Essential Interpretation of Substantive Motion; Comparing the Views of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 1(2 ), 161-177. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/412302/en

Vancouver: Copy

NOJABA NAFISEH. Critical Analysis of the Essential Interpretation of Substantive Motion; Comparing the Views of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2021;1(2 ):161-177. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/412302/en

IEEE: Copy

NAFISEH NOJABA, “Critical Analysis of the Essential Interpretation of Substantive Motion; Comparing the Views of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra,” METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 1, no. 2 , pp. 161–177, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/412302/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops