A HISTORICAL–CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIRI (HOSSEINI) SEYYED MUHSEN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Year:2012 | Volume:2 | Issue:3 (7) Page(s): 9-36

Download Full-Text

View:

218

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A HISTORICAL–CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE

Author(s)

MIRI (HOSSEINI) SEYYED MUHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE

THE FIRST EMANATED

NECESSARY BEING

SIMPLE EMANATION

INTELLECT

Abstract

The PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE is a long-standing philosophical principle. It states that, according to rational arguments, a single cause, since it is one, is followed by no more than a single effect directly.The roots of the discussion of this principle can be found in the words of Plotinus and Proclus, however, it was expanded, deepened, and defended mainly in the rational Islamic tradition by Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Tusi. Since then, it has always been emphasized by almost all philosophers and some gnostics and theologians. Nevertheless, several scholars such as Ghazzali, Ibn Rushd, Fakhr al-Din Razi, Ibn Arabi, Thomas Aquinas (in some of his works), 'Allamah Hilli, and 'Allamah Majlisi have mainly opposed this theory basically under the pretext of defending religious beliefs.This paper intends to have an analytic, historical, and critical study of the ideas of the opponents of this principle. Here, the writer has initially explained the arguments of some of the believers in this principle and then dealt with the objections of those who reject it. Finally, in order to defend the principle of the one, he responds to each of the objections separately.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MIRI (HOSSEINI), SEYYED MUHSEN. (2012). A HISTORICAL–CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 2(3 (7)), 9-36. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/578459/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIRI (HOSSEINI) SEYYED MUHSEN. A HISTORICAL–CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY[Internet]. 2012;2(3 (7)):9-36. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/578459/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED MUHSEN MIRI (HOSSEINI), “A HISTORICAL–CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NOTHING PROCEEDS FROM THE ONE BUT ONE,” HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, vol. 2, no. 3 (7), pp. 9–36, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/578459/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops