THE ANALYSIS OF SADROLMOTE ALLEHIN'S RESPONSE TO KHAJEH TUSI'S FIRST CRITIQUE ON IMPRINTED FORMS (THE DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

EMADZADEH GH.H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES Year:2006 | Volume:- | Issue:50 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON PHILOSOPHY) Page(s): 129-136

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

639

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ANALYSIS OF SADROLMOTE ALLEHIN'S RESPONSE TO KHAJEH TUSI'S FIRST CRITIQUE ON IMPRINTED FORMS (THE DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE)

Author(s)

EMADZADEH GH.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AVICENNAQ3

SADRAQ3

TUSIQ3

DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGEQ3

IMPRINTED FORMSQ3

AGENTQ4

RECIPIENT OCCURRENCEQ3

THE ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE NECESSARYQ3

REAL ATTRIBUTES ADDED (TO THE ESSENCE)Q3

RELATIVE ATTRIBUTESQ3

Abstract

The divine knowledge is one of the most prominent philosophical and theological issues that Islamic philosophers proved wisdom in. But because of the fact that common practice was based on puncitilitiousness and objection to the predecessors thoughts, a renovation or completion of the demolished structure often initiated afterward. Avicena proposed the IMPRINTED FORMS in the DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE. These forms were firmly critisized by TUSI. Despite SADRA's acceptance of the critiques, he defended AVICENNA's proposal. This article is an effort to rationally analyze SADRA's first critique on TUSI's thoughts in brief.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

EMADZADEH, GH.H.. (2006). THE ANALYSIS OF SADROLMOTE ALLEHIN'S RESPONSE TO KHAJEH TUSI'S FIRST CRITIQUE ON IMPRINTED FORMS (THE DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE). JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES, -(50 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON PHILOSOPHY)), 129-136. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/66936/en

Vancouver: Copy

EMADZADEH GH.H.. THE ANALYSIS OF SADROLMOTE ALLEHIN'S RESPONSE TO KHAJEH TUSI'S FIRST CRITIQUE ON IMPRINTED FORMS (THE DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE). JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;-(50 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON PHILOSOPHY)):129-136. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/66936/en

IEEE: Copy

GH.H. EMADZADEH, “THE ANALYSIS OF SADROLMOTE ALLEHIN'S RESPONSE TO KHAJEH TUSI'S FIRST CRITIQUE ON IMPRINTED FORMS (THE DIVINE SEPARATIVE KNOWLEDGE),” JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES, vol. -, no. 50 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON PHILOSOPHY), pp. 129–136, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/66936/en

Related Journal Papers