IDENTIFYING DOCTORAL ADMISSIONS CRITERIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARAJI DEHSORKHI HATAM; ARASTEH HAMIDREZA; NAVEHABRAHIM ABDOLRAHIM; ABDOLAHI BIJAN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION Year:2016 | Volume:21 | Issue:4 (78) Page(s): 71-97

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

813

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IDENTIFYING DOCTORAL ADMISSIONS CRITERIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Author(s)

FARAJI DEHSORKHI HATAM | ARASTEH HAMIDREZA | NAVEHABRAHIM ABDOLRAHIM | ABDOLAHI BIJAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HIGHER EDUCATIONQ2

ADMISSIONS SYSTEMQ2

CRITERIAQ2

PREDICTORSQ2

DOCTORAL PROGRAMSQ2

Abstract

In recent years, doctoral admission system has been subject to many disputes among academicians and has drawn a great deal of attention due to its role in assuring the quality of graduate programs. Hence, the present paper aimed to investigate doctoral admissions CRITERIA as well as to develop a conceptual model. In doing so, a phenomenological quality method was applied. A purposive sample of 14 informants across different disciplines was interviewed. To analyze data, the coding system of opening, axial, and selective was used. The findings were arranged under two main groups: CRITERIA and PREDICTORS. With respect to CRITERIA, 72 initial codes, 16 subcategories, and 5 categories were extracted. With respect to PREDICTORS, 95 initial codes, 16 subcategories, and 7 categories were extracted. Finally, according to findings and review of the literature, the admission system conceptual model was developed.

Cites

Design and Implementation of a Structured Interview of Ph. D. Entrance Exam in Medical Sciences Universities

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FARAJI DEHSORKHI, HATAM, ARASTEH, HAMIDREZA, NAVEHABRAHIM, ABDOLRAHIM, & ABDOLAHI, BIJAN. (2016). IDENTIFYING DOCTORAL ADMISSIONS CRITERIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 21(4 (78)), 71-97. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/67984/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARAJI DEHSORKHI HATAM, ARASTEH HAMIDREZA, NAVEHABRAHIM ABDOLRAHIM, ABDOLAHI BIJAN. IDENTIFYING DOCTORAL ADMISSIONS CRITERIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION[Internet]. 2016;21(4 (78)):71-97. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/67984/en

IEEE: Copy

HATAM FARAJI DEHSORKHI, HAMIDREZA ARASTEH, ABDOLRAHIM NAVEHABRAHIM, and BIJAN ABDOLAHI, “IDENTIFYING DOCTORAL ADMISSIONS CRITERIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 21, no. 4 (78), pp. 71–97, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/67984/en

Related Journal Papers